Saturday plans

Yesterday, I tried 12m QRP FT8 as an experiment. It was not as busy as 10m, but I was still spotted widely. More stations spotted me than I expected especially with QRP. 

Today I may give 4m FT8 another go. At some point I must install SPECTRAN on my PC and sort out the optical interface. 

Upcoming optical tests on 481 THz

It is years since I did optical experiments. My current plan is to do some local tests with QRSS bouncing off buildings. If these are successful, I want to try an "over the horizon" test with G4HJW. 

My first task will be to install Spectran 2 software as this will be needed to decode QRSS and to check the signal margins.

Spectran V2

It is many years since I last used this program. It runs under Windows and allows a spectrum view in narrow bandwidths. I used it both for VLF and optical tests. It is now at version 2. It proved very useful in the past. I must download it again.

 See https://www.sdradio.eu/weaksignals/spectran.html

More analysis with Spectrum Lab software

Spectran is a very easy package to use but it has its limitations when analysing weak audio signals. A more powerful package is DL4YHF's  Spectrum Laboratory which is an extremely powerful piece of software. The problem is that if I've not used it for months it takes me hours to remember how to drive it. A secret is to store ".usr" configuration files so one can go back instantly to a set of settings e.g. a given frequency to analyse with a specified bandpass filter and bandwidth.

Faint line at 8.9775kHz visible at greater range (43mHz bandwidth)

Anyway, to cut a long story, this evening I set up some config files to allow me to look again at the recordings of my 8.9775kHz VLF earth-mode signals made during recent drive around tests locally. Although the original analysis was done at 180mHz bandwidth I can now replay the recordings and look in bandwidths down to 34mHz. What happens then is that signals present but too weak to see now appear above the noise floor as a faint line. The net result is that the signals can be detected in some of the "in between" locations that were not apparent from the 180mHz (wider!) bandwidth analysis.

I intend to use Spectrum Laboratory and narrow bandwidths for the over-the-horizon 481THz optical tests if Spectran proves not up to the job. However, when bandwidths are very narrow there is a time-lag before the trace appears on the screen. This is less than ideal when trying to align weak optical signals with beamwidths measured in a degree or less. What is needed is an accurate beam heading and then allow the trace to build on the screen. I don't have enough experience yet to know how much beamwidth spread a cloud or free space dust scattered optical signal gets. When looking for G4HJW's signal over the horizon in clear skies last year the alignment was quite critical, but his signal was audible in headphones so the optics could be peaked by ear before analysing with Spectran or Spectrum Lab. I had more luck with my own QRSS3 signal over the horizon on a shorter path, managing to align by eye on visible landmarks enough to see the trace on the PC and then peak it.

PC based LF/MF receivers

There are some very neat ideas for simple LF receivers around that make use of programs like Spectran or Argo effectively as the second IF and detector stages.

DK7FC's simple 137kHz receiver

DK7FC recently posted his schematic for his 137kHz receiver which used a 4MHz crystal divided down to 125kHz using a 4060 IC with the IF at 12kHz (corresponding to 137kHz) being fed straight into the PC software. With programs like Argo the scale can be offset so that the correct frequency is displayed. Of course, there needs to be some front end filtering to remove the image, in this case at 113kHz. Using this approach one can make a very simple "stand alone" LF receiver for 137kHz weak signal reception. Such an approach is ideal for grabbers which are permanently connected to a PC anyway, uploading the received signals to the internet.

Failed cloudbounce 481THz optical test (7.6km)

Possible weak 481THz reception at 7.6km NLOS

This evening I tried a 7.6km non line-of-sight (NLOS) path between Burwell and Newmarket Heath with the 0.7W input red LED beacon running QRSS3 on an 820Hz subcarrier (at home) and modified KA7OEI receiver at the RX end, both with 100mm optics. My PC was running Spectran.

The best I can say is reception was very doubtful:  the screen capture above shows a signal at the correct subcarrier frequency in the right direction, but too weak to identify CW characters. The recent 3.6km NLOS test produced good 10dB S/N signals in 0.67Hz bandwidth - much easier.

With a largely clear sky, few clouds and a slight haze, not ideal conditions for cloudbounce testing. This test will be repeated when cloud cover is better and visibility is clearer. QRSS30 would give me another 10dB so this may be worth a go if QRSS3 doesn't work on a second try. There are several variables that make weak signal forward scatter detection difficult: (a) what vertical angle to use at both ends, especially with few clouds (b) amount and height of cloud cover, (c) horizontal direction of aim.  With QRSS3/30 modes it is a case of small aiming increments and wait to see if a signal appears on the screen. It is quite hard work.

The result is disappointing, but there will be plenty of other occasions to repeat this test and do others. All good  fun.

Successful non line-of-sight 481THz test tonight by cloudbounce

QRSS3 signal at 3.6km by non line-of-sight cloudbounce

Armed with my simpler QRSS3/CW beacon (see earlier post) I did a very successful non line-of-sight (NLOS) cloudbounce test this evening using my 1W red LED in 100mm optics (run at 340mA). TX was my "G3XBM" message in QRSS3 (3 second dots CW) at 820Hz subcarrier.

With the beacon aiming out through the double glazed shack window at nearby Burwell windmill (as an aiming point) I set off for a road at Landwade which was 3.6km away "over the hill" and on a NLOS path from here. At Landwade I set up the 100mm optics and my variation of the KA7OEI head feeding into my laptop running Spectran. Immediately I got a good signal from the beacon 3.6km away. Signal was around 10dB S/N in 0.67Hz bandwidth. The signal was neither visible as a red glow nor audible in the earpiece despite listening quite hard and panning around for best signal.

This was my first proper NLOS test and it is extremely encouraging. I did try to elevate the RX to higher points in the sky but best reception was with the optics aiming at the lights of Burwell village in the distance i.e. as low as was possible in elevation. At the TX end I was aiming to just clear the slight rise in ground to the east of me near Burwell windmill.

Weather conditions were light patchy low cloud with pretty decent visibility. I did notice QSB as cloud cover varied.

I'm really lucky finding this test path as I can put the TX beacon on the bedroom shack windowsill and fire towards the windmill. In daytime I would be able to align the RX better as I was having to guess the best direction with only Burwell church visible. I had to tweek the alignment to what I thought was the right direction. I did not spend a lot of time trying to peak the signal and better copy is possible.  In all honestly I did not expect this test to be successful.

Optical "tree bounce" tests

Spectran screenshot of 481THz "treebounce" test 30.1.12

Last night I made my first recordings of my optical beacon in action. In one room of the house the 100mm optics beacon was set running QRSS3 and aiming at a tree 150m away across a field. This was a deciduous tree with just bare branches. In another room of the house, optically well isolated from the TX, I set up the 100mm optics KE7OEI head feeding an earpiece and my PC running Spectran. The signal scattering off the tree (total path length 0.3km) was 30dB over noise in a 2.7Hz bandwidth. This suggests (I think) that other non line-of-sight paths with a total distance of up to 1km might be possible by reflection off trees, buildings etc. I have still to try a true line-of-sight path at any distance with my current system but it will certainly be good for many kilometres.

Yesterday my 1W ultra-bright LEDs arrived from Hong Kong. When fitted to the beacon these will be VERY bright and will extend the range possible on 481THz yet further. All good fun!

Using Spectran to listen to HF CW

Usually free Spectran software is used here to see VLF signals when doing my earth mode tests. However it also makes a very useful add-on to the FT817 as an adjustable width audio filter. Select the NDB settings and then use the filters (adjustable edges with right and left mouse buttons) with the menu on the left set to "BandPass". It is useful on SSB and on CW and allows the bandwidths to be screwed right down to as low as need be. There is also a CW peak function which puts a narrow filter around 800Hz.

Receiver/grabber improvements on VLF

Just received a special build of Spectran from Alberto I2PHD that keeps the same filename for captured grabber images. This means I can now use Spectran with my VLF grabber. This is fired up from time to time when people are doing VLF tests. It will also allow me to look for my own signal at home when I am out transmitting in the Fens locally some kms from home. I find Spectran easier to use than Spectrum Lab, which is a clever program but complicated for someone like me to configure.

I have also rebuilt the 4-5W beacon TX on 8.76kHz and given it a 1 hour continuous soak test. There is a video about this on my YouTube channel.

My next job is to work on a permanent VLF E-field probe outdoors and to make improvements to the receiving system for field use. I need a better preamp/filter that can also be used with earth electrode receiving antennas as well as the loop and E-field whips.

136kHz using the earth electrode "antenna"

This evening I was able to copy G3XIZ on 136.5kHz CW at 559 using my deaf (at 136kHz) FT817 fed from my 20m base earth electrode "antenna" used on VLF. I've made a recording and emailed it to Chris who is 46km away from me. Later this year I hope to transmit QRSS or CW on 136kHz, but the antenna needs some thought as I don't have much space.

VLF Earth Mode: 3.6km DX today with 4W

My earth mode VLF DX increased to 3.6km today using QRSS3 and a PC running Spectran. TX was 4W into 20m separated electrodes in the ground. TX frequency was 838Hz. The 80cm loop and preamp receiver were set up in several places well out of the village in several directions and results well exceeded my expectations. Lots of information on my earth mode webpage including screen shots and sound recordings made using Spectran when out in the field.

This screenshot was from the roadside 2.5km south of the QTH. Signals were so strong (30dB S/N) that the signal was audible when Spectran's BPF in circuit (lots of 50Hz hum without).

Screengrab of 1.8kHz earthmode transmission today

Today I modified my VLF TX so it could send either a 10 wpm or QRSS3 beacon signal. I also went out into the fields with my loop/preamp and a PC with Spectran to receive it. For the first attempt with a PC I went 0.3km away from home where the 4W signal from the earth electrode "antenna" could clearly be received by ear. With Spectran I could read the 10wpm CW signal with 20dB S/N in a 12Hz bandwidth, if my understanding of the Spectran settings is right. There is an audio recording here so you can judge the S/N yourselves. This suggests that with QRSS3 and really screwing the bandwidth down I should be able to do much better. My problem is knowing how to calibrate the soundcard etc and clearly I need a more stable source than my free running twin-tee audio oscillator.