50W red LEDs cheap on eBay

Bernie G4HJW recently posted to the UK Nanowave Yahoo about some powerful red LEDs that he bought from China for just £2.80. A couple of these are more powerful than the 10mm LEDs that I used in non line of night tests (when I was fitter) but even without any lenses!  It would seem these would be ideal for optical tests. 50W is a lot of power. This was Bernie's post. I trust he won't mind me sharing it with you all:

"Morning all - This might be of general interest:

I recently bought a couple of 50W red LEDs from China, which I thought I might use in a wide-angle initial set-up lantern for portable use. They were very cheap (£2.80), so I also expected there would be dead segments, which there were, but there was a bigger surprise waiting to show itself.

During this weeks UK uwave group net, Martyn G3UKV asked me how wide the spectrum was, so out came my trusty secondary school Spectroscope. Instead of the expected relatively narrow response, there was noticeable output right through to yellow plus a weakish narrow line at the violet end. This should have been an obvious clue, of course, but it was only later when I was telling Stuart G8CYW (sorry about all the name dropping..) that he suggested  that the LEDs might be fluorescent driven devices, just like the white lighting LEDs all seem to be these days. He was correct, as the following picture shows:

http://www.earf.co.uk/uvred.JPG

Note that in pealing back some of the fluorescent gell, all but one of the individual 1W UV leds have been destroyed. Not obvious from the picture is that these LEDs are embedded in an initial clear silicon rubber prior to the red fluorescent layer being applied. From supplier ebay pictures, it is now clear that the same UV driven devices are available in all colours, leading to the question - does this produce an overall increase in efficiency, or is there simply a significant cost saving in just fabricting UV LEDs?.

I've yet to measure the response time of the fluorescent material.

Bernie
G4HJW"

Working with simple optical gear was one of my great pleasures, so I very much hope I can do this again. Optical gear is easier than microwaves. All my kit was home designed and built and the test gear simplicity itself.  For details of my optical work see http://www.g3xbm.co.uk  . G4HJW and others know far more than me in this area. I consider myself very much a novice in this area.

Optical Comms in Vancouver Canada

This morning I received an email from Steve, VE7SL, reporting on his experiments with VE7CA over a 2-way distance of 54km using red LEDs.  They are doing really well and Steve is writing an article for a Canadian journal. They seem to have been encouraged by my own modest efforts,which I hope to restart before too long. At present my poor fitness and temporary inability to drive because of the stroke are real handicaps.

Image of optical path spanned from VE7SL

Infra-red "over the horizon" tests?

Reading Stuart G8CYW's article on the history of optical communications in the latest RadCom, I am considering repeating my recent NLOS optical test using infra-red (IR) rather than visible light as there may be some advantages with clear air forward scatter propagation by going to lower near optical frequencies. At least IR beams are not visible to the casual viewer, so are less likely to create problems.  However, IR can be more dangerous than visible light because the blink reaction that occurs with visible light does not happen. When using high power IR LEDs it is therefore even more important not to look into the beam and to take care where the beam is aimed, especially at close range. Never ever look into the beam at close range.

A suitable IR PIN diode is the SRH203-FA from Osram, widely available on eBay.  As you can see from the image, the PIN diode detector has IR filtering (black colour) , so may be usable in daylight with less degradation than would be the case with red LEDs.  I already use the SRH213 PIN diode for visible red optical comms.

I am looking for a suitable 1W-3W IR LED and they are available, but I have yet to find one in the 10mm "fat" standard LED package that I use currently on 481THz.

There are 3W IR LEDs available from China that should be suitable. See eBay item 370784927290 for example in the star package. This would be some 10dB more output than I currently use, although I am not sure of the beam divergence which may be greater than with the 10mm package.

Nanowave over-the-horizon experiments are very much like microwaves, except that the test equipment is a GREAT deal simpler!

Frustrating day at both ends of the spectrum

Today I tried two experiments. Firstly a continuation of my tests with the loop and E-field probe out in the fens on 8.977kHz and then tonight, another over-the-horizon test on 481THz.

Failure 1 at VLF: whereas in the past I've had a decent signal at my test site at Tubney Fen 3.5km from home on the loop antenna on 8.977kHz, today I could copy nothing. There was some strong interference and I thought that may have been the problem, so I moved on to a second test site 5km away where again I usually get a good signal. Again nothing. In the past this second site has given me signals so strong that I could copy 10wpm CW from home on 1kHz by earth mode. Now around the village and in nearby Swaffham Prior the signal levels were (as far as I can recall) similar to past levels, so what has changed? One theory is that the wet winter has saturated the fenland soil so conductivity is much higher, resulting in much higher attenuation at VLF.  Another possibility is some utility has changed - a change of pipe type or a re-routing of an electricity cable? My TX and RX equipment is largely the same as in previous tests.

Optical QRM on the 820Hz sub-carrier frequency

Failure 2 at 481THz: I tried a third attempt at my over-the-horizon QRSS3 reception of my signal on a 820Hz sub-carrier. This has been successful in the past. The 100mm lens TX was carefully aligned just to the right of our local windmill on "the hill" and I traveled to what should have been a direct line path (but over the horizon so the signal has to be scattered) about 3.5km away. Optical conditions looked good with clear visibility of street lights in Burwell. Well, I am pretty certain that I was able to hear my signal by ear in the headphones keying away slowly, but because of a lead failure (later fixed) and then a strong interfering signal very close to the 820Hz sub-carrier, I failed to see my signal with Spectran and make a screen capture. I think this QRM signal is related to new street lighting as panning the horizon brought up this interference on most street lights at around 3km range. The solution will be to choose a different sub-carrier tone frequency. BTW, it is fun to hear the strobe lights from aircraft: these are very strong and can be copied well off the direct path by scattering.

My next immediate priority is to change the optical beacon TX so that I can use a range of different sub-carrier frequencies all derived from an HF crystal divided down with a 4060 divider. This will also allow me to run a continuous signal which will help with alignment and I can avoid QRM by moving the HF crystal frequency if needed. I could also arrange DFCW modulation by FSK keying the HF crystal: this will allow a continuous signal for audible alignment yet be detectable with software packages like Spectran in QRSS3.

As regards the VLF earth-mode tests, for now I am going to draw these to a halt and will try again in a month or so when I hope the fen soil conductivity has reduced. If things are unchanged then I suspect that something in the utilities metalwork out in the fens has (permanently) changed.

QRO optical beacon for over-the-horizon tests

12W red LEDs for optical beaconing

This afternoon I ordered 3 off 12W red LEDs, called a Phlatlight PT54, from the USA. These were originally designed for use in projectors and are VERY bright indeed (425 lumens at 8.1A!).  My plan is to use one of these in my new 481THz optical CW/QRSS beacon for over the horizon non line-of-sight (NLOS) tests this winter.  If you are interested, look up item 170884888890 on eBay. The datasheet for the Phlatlight LED is available at http://www.mouser.com/catalog/specsheets/pt54phlatlight.pdf .

My original beacon circuit is shown below and was a good signal over the horizon 3.6km from home when using Spectran to show the received signal, which was not even visible to the naked eye or audible in a headset. I am hoping that a very similar circuit will work for the Phlatlight LED beacon.

The QRO beacon should be much stronger, so I am expecting to be able to achieve much greater NLOS ranges, especially as my receiver is capable of considerably greater sensitivity with more work and using better PIN photodiodes with a more optimal 3dB sensitivity angle. The main issue is a thermal one: although the device is mounted on quite a good heatsink, I need to find out how hot this gets when sending CW or QRSS and derate it accordingly. I am hoping that around 4-5A should be possible which should allow some 20dB more output.

Successful non line-of-sight 481THz test tonight by cloudbounce

QRSS3 signal at 3.6km by non line-of-sight cloudbounce

Armed with my simpler QRSS3/CW beacon (see earlier post) I did a very successful non line-of-sight (NLOS) cloudbounce test this evening using my 1W red LED in 100mm optics (run at 340mA). TX was my "G3XBM" message in QRSS3 (3 second dots CW) at 820Hz subcarrier.

With the beacon aiming out through the double glazed shack window at nearby Burwell windmill (as an aiming point) I set off for a road at Landwade which was 3.6km away "over the hill" and on a NLOS path from here. At Landwade I set up the 100mm optics and my variation of the KA7OEI head feeding into my laptop running Spectran. Immediately I got a good signal from the beacon 3.6km away. Signal was around 10dB S/N in 0.67Hz bandwidth. The signal was neither visible as a red glow nor audible in the earpiece despite listening quite hard and panning around for best signal.

This was my first proper NLOS test and it is extremely encouraging. I did try to elevate the RX to higher points in the sky but best reception was with the optics aiming at the lights of Burwell village in the distance i.e. as low as was possible in elevation. At the TX end I was aiming to just clear the slight rise in ground to the east of me near Burwell windmill.

Weather conditions were light patchy low cloud with pretty decent visibility. I did notice QSB as cloud cover varied.

I'm really lucky finding this test path as I can put the TX beacon on the bedroom shack windowsill and fire towards the windmill. In daytime I would be able to align the RX better as I was having to guess the best direction with only Burwell church visible. I had to tweek the alignment to what I thought was the right direction. I did not spend a lot of time trying to peak the signal and better copy is possible.  In all honestly I did not expect this test to be successful.

More 481THz lightbeam progress

670nm receive head and converter to 80m

Today I did some further light beam experiments, this time using a 25kHz modulation signal on the light beam and receiving the signal on my FT817 with this head/converter unit above. It consists of a BPW34 photo-detector feeding a cascode FET/transistor stage into an emitter follower and SBL1 mixer to convert the signal to around 3.584MHz. With a current into the TX LED of just 10uA (a very dim glow from the red LED) the signal was 20dB S/N in 0.67Hz bandwidth on Spectran at a distance of 25cms without optics. If my calculations are correct, this means a range of around 100m could be obtained even with this miniscule power if 100mm lenses were added at each end to give some 27dB gain at each end. Using the same TX LED at 10mA (1000 times the current) then the range is already in the many km region, and this is without using power LEDs. This is encouraging progress. Tomorrow I want to repeat the test with the same LED as the TX as the detector.

UKNanowaves Group

G0EHV's lightbeam kit (from the UKNanowaves group photos)

Today I joined the UKNanowaves Group which is dedicated to optical communications.  There is a lot of useful information on this group in the postings and in the files and photos sections. Reading the membership list I noticed several local amateurs interested in optical comms, so when I get my equipment for 481THz working credibly I will have a good chance of some QSOs locally.

Today some of my optical comms electronics parts arrived so I hope to start experimenting with these on the bench shortly. Most gear built for 481THz is simple and homebrew. Apart from designs using transverters to HF or VHF, all kit is in the 0-40kHz frequency range, so easily engineered with simple test equipment. Perhaps, like VLF and LF, this is partly why it appeals to me.

111km optical QSO in Yorkshire

G8AGN/P and G0EWN/P achieved a 111km speech QSO on optical communications using 0.5W red LEDs and Fresnel lenses on April 6th 2011. Brilliant stuff.

Optical Comms DX

The latest RSGB news reports that G8CYW and G8KPD have set up a new UK record for optical DX over a distance of just under 90km in NE England using SSB and FM with a design that appeared in a recent RadCom.

Optical DXing at around 460THz

Until I read the webpage below I didn't know that the record for optical morse DX goes back to 1896 and was an astounding distance of 183 miles using a Heliograph between Colorado and Utah in the USA. This link about the heliograph makes fascinating reading. The heliograph is essentially a keyed mirror that reflects sunlight and uses it to send morse code over long distances.  Modern versions of heliograph mirrors are available on eBay for emergency communications. See for example eBay item 250681260168. A good article about heliographs is on Wikipedia, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliograph.

Modern amateur optical DXing uses either lasers or high intensity LEDs. There is a piece about this on p51-52 of the Feb 2011 RSGB RadCom in Sam Jewell's "GHz Bands" column with further links including http://www.lasercomms.org.uk/index.htm which looks like a useful resource.  There was also a funny article in the RSGB Bulletin of April 1962 called "Getting Going on Bottom Band".  

Joule Thief circuit

This month's Practical Wireless makes reference to something called the Joule Thief circuit which allows a very nearly exhausted single cell battery to run a white LED. The article is in G3RJV's regular column. The nifty circuit only needs 4 parts. For a video describing how to build this, see this YouTube item. Another useful resource is http://www.emanator.demon.co.uk/bigclive/joule.htm from which this image was taken.