As I recall, it was about 30 turns of 0.2mm PVC covered wire.
It is still in the back of the garage, I think. It is many years since I did any tests at VLF.
Simple QRP projects, 10m, 8m, 6m, 4m, FT8, 160m, WSPR, LF/MF, sub-9kHz, nanowaves and other random stuff, some not related to amateur radio.
As I recall, it was about 30 turns of 0.2mm PVC covered wire.
It is still in the back of the garage, I think. It is many years since I did any tests at VLF.
There is widespread Es on 10m this morning. A few moments ago (it is now 0917z) I turned on 10m FT8 RX with the FT817ND and the tiny indoor loop antenna. Already, 49 stations have been spotted.
UPDATE 0948z: 85 stations spotted on RX.
UPDATE 1214z: 198 stations spotted on RX. The furthermost is VO1CH (3737km).
UPDATE 1604z: 325 stations spotted on RX.
UPDATE 1904z: 467 stations spotted on RX with the furthermost PY5BH (9903km).
UPDATE 1954z: 514 stations spotted on RX today. See map.
As you may know, I have no external antenna for 10m at present. Instead I use the 50cm loop on the shack windowsill.
It is extremely hard to measure the difference in performance of, say, a dipole and my loop. Even over quite small distances signal levels can vary greatly. There are many factors: location, time, directivity, polarisation, radiation angle etc.
The best I could do is compare signal levels at similar times in the best and worst directions of the loop with that received by others locally. The best I can work out is that the loop is up to 6dB down. There are quite wide errors bars on this.
Overall, the loop is performing better than I expected.
If there is F2 DX from the USA or South America later, I shall try again. With lower angle signals the differences might be greater.
G0LRD (26km from me) copies far more, although if he can copy signals that are 6dB weaker, I would expect this to make a considerable difference on FT8.
It will be interesting to see my results later with an external antenna. The impression I get is that the small loop is not too bad on Es signals from Europe, but it performs less well with low angle DX signals.
UPDATE 1915z: Well there's a surprise! CX2CC (11128km) was coming through just now. I was getting him 5dB S/N better than G0LRD (26km). This may just be the momentary polarisation being optimum. Still it proves the loop cannot be too bad.
UPDATE 2101z: At the moment I am confused: many times G0LRD is copying better than me and he certainly is spotting far more stations than me. Nonetheless the loop is not at all bad considering its small size and being indoors!
For a change I am on 10m FT8 RX with the FT817ND and the tiny indoor loop (50cm diameter) antenna.
Plenty of Europeans being spotted by Es. After just a few minutes, 51 stations spotted with the furthermost being 5T5PA (3791km) in Mauritania, West Africa.
UPDATE 1246z: 150 stations spotted.UPDATE 1913z: 524 stations spotted so far today.
UPDATE 2146z: 682 stations spotted today. Furthermost is PP5JD (10072km). I now have to go QRT and disconnect everything.
It is now 0855z. I have been on 10m FT8 RX for about 30 minutes and have spotted 11 stations so far using the 4 transistor RX and indoor loop.
UPDATE 1601z So far today, 98 stations spotted on 10m FT8 RX. See map.
My guess is the loop currently used is about 10dB down on a dipole. This is an estimate based on the stations I am not spotting. Nonetheless it works quite well for something so small with just a wire inductor about 50cms across. The "proper" 10m loop has a much thicker made of central heating pipe. It is far sharper, but harder to tune, but probably several dBs better.
What has surprised me is it the Whizz-Loop has even spanned the Atlantic several times with QRP FT8 on 17m.
I hope to get a 10m dipole up outside next week. I could make it cover 6m as well.
See https://sites.google.com/site/g3xbmqrp3/antennas/magloop .
With QRP powers, ordinary capacitors may be used. Most times I use an old Wonder Wand Loop for 20m, 17m, 15m, 12m and 10m. My 10m loop, homemade with copper pipe, is sharper and more efficient, but harder to tune.
See https://sites.google.com/site/g3xbmqrp3/antennas/magloop.
This afternoon, I tried in vain, to mend my "better" 10m loop antenna. I failed.
Before, there was a distinct peak when tuned and the SWR dipped significantly on resonance. Sadly, just a few minutes of soldering work left me totally exhausted and giddy. I shall have to try again another day. After about 10 minutes of physical or mental work I am just knackered. Whether this is my stroke or just old age I do not know.
At the moment I am still on 15m FT8 on the "poorer" loop.
From my own limited experience, I can say that magnetic loops work and are small. They are not ideal where frequent changes of frequency are required (if efficient they are very sharp) but they are ideal for modes like FT8 or PSK where most of the time you are within a few kilohertz.
With high power, often vacuum sealed capacitors are needed. With QRP, ordinary capacitors are fine. Even though the voltages at the high impedance points are high, they are nothing like the kVs seen with higher power.
I suspect loops are down on full-sized antennas, but they work pretty well. Being narrow-band probably helps keep QRN down too. In the absence of external antennas they can be used in the shack. If making the loop yourself use the thickest material you can for the loop inductor: I use central heating copper pipe, but I suspect thick coax would be fine. You don't need much.
I see Southgate News has a piece on a new commercially available loop although it is quite easy to make your own.
See also https://sites.google.com/site/g3xbmqrp3/antennas/magloop
17m FT8 TX with 10W to the tiny magnetic loop |
Stations spotted so far today on 17m FT8 RX with the tiny magnetic loop on the windowsill |
Stations spotting my 10W 17m FT8 with the magnetic loop today |
Every few weeks I take a peek at the narrowband activity on Oscar 100, the geosynchronous satellite. My own view is activity is patheticall...