Years ago I created a filter to delete Alibris emails. It seems this company has regular sales, so I used to ignore these. Thank goodness for Gmail filters.
Alibris is a good place to look for secondhand books, although with their regular sales, it is doubtful paying the full price makes sense.
4 Jan 2020
SPAM - NOT amateur radio
Quite a few of my friends, supposedly, are still sending me SPAM links. Thankfully, Gmail filters these so they appear in my SPAM folder.
It is entirely possible that these people do not know their email addresses are being used to send SPAM. My policy is always to delete these without opening. I strongly urge you to do the same. Many of these links install viruses or malware and can be very dangerous.
If in any doubt, you may have to change your email addresses, change passwords frequently and use a virus/malware program.
It is entirely possible that these people do not know their email addresses are being used to send SPAM. My policy is always to delete these without opening. I strongly urge you to do the same. Many of these links install viruses or malware and can be very dangerous.
If in any doubt, you may have to change your email addresses, change passwords frequently and use a virus/malware program.
Labels:
spa
160m FT8 RX overnight
Last evening and night were good here on 160m FT8 RX.
I lost count of the North Americans copied. In all, over 40 North Americans, 10 Caribbeans,2 South Americans as well as Asians and Africans copied. As for European stations there were hundreds.
As before, using the earth-electrode "antenna" in the ground. This is proving remarkably effective. 160m operation has been a total surprise!
Overall, 672 stations in 5 continents spotted on 160m FT8 RX in the last day (see map).
I lost count of the North Americans copied. In all, over 40 North Americans, 10 Caribbeans,2 South Americans as well as Asians and Africans copied. As for European stations there were hundreds.
As before, using the earth-electrode "antenna" in the ground. This is proving remarkably effective. 160m operation has been a total surprise!
Overall, 672 stations in 5 continents spotted on 160m FT8 RX in the last day (see map).
![]() |
Stations spotted here in the last 24 hours on 160m
FT8 RX with the earth-electrode "antenna" in the ground
|
Chromebooks - NOT amateur radio
It is about 6 weeks since I bought a Chromebook. I am a convert!
What amazes me is that I can do everything it seems I could do on a Windows PC, but this is instantly there - no waiting for Windose to boot up, the battery lasts well over a day on a single charge, and I can use it as a tablet if I want to, not that I have.
It is lightweight, small and perfectly suited to my needs. I do not regret buying it one bit.
What amazes me is that I can do everything it seems I could do on a Windows PC, but this is instantly there - no waiting for Windose to boot up, the battery lasts well over a day on a single charge, and I can use it as a tablet if I want to, not that I have.
It is lightweight, small and perfectly suited to my needs. I do not regret buying it one bit.
Labels:
chrome os,
chromebook
Finbar EI0CF's experimental 160m magnetic loop antenna
Finbar EI0CF has been experimenting with a 160m magnetic loop antenna in his garage. He has been using powers of between 700mW and 10W and has been amazed at the results. He has had WSPR reports from several stations in North America as well as plenty of others in other directions.
For fixed frequency operation (these loops are very sharply tuned if working efficiently) these antennas can be remarkably effective. With high powers, the RF voltages at the high impedance points can be very high (less of an issue with QRP) which is one reason people use capacitors rated for very high voltages in some cases.
It is some years since I used a loop on 10m WSPR, but recall being amazed how well these small antennas worked. The photo shows Finbar's experimental 160m loop.
For fixed frequency operation (these loops are very sharply tuned if working efficiently) these antennas can be remarkably effective. With high powers, the RF voltages at the high impedance points can be very high (less of an issue with QRP) which is one reason people use capacitors rated for very high voltages in some cases.
It is some years since I used a loop on 10m WSPR, but recall being amazed how well these small antennas worked. The photo shows Finbar's experimental 160m loop.
3 Jan 2020
Onesies - NOT amateur radio
Two of our grandchildren got "onesies" for Christmas. Here one of our granddaughters is wearing hers in this photo (right hand side). On the left she is looking at our latest photo album.
Labels:
granddaughter,
onesies
160m FT8
At about 1740z I QSYed to 160m FT8. A 10W CQ was spotted by 35 stations and I was called by 1 SP station. On 160m FT8 RX 64 stations spotted with best DX spotted UT0MY (2696km).
UPDATE 1952z: 150 stations spotted on 160m FT8 RX with best DX 9K2HN (4567km).
UPDATE 2038z: Amazing!!! Not only was a recent 160m FT8 CQ to the earth-electrode "antenna" in the ground answered by a station in Germany, but I was spotted by 72 stations (in the last 6 hours) including VO1HP (3768km). This by far the most distant report I have ever had on 160m, but this was with my invisible antenna and QRP! The latter is the first report I have ever had from "across the pond" on 160m.
UPDATE 2255z: 295 stations spotted on 160m FT8 RX, with a good number from North America, The Caribbean, the Middle East and Europe.
UPDATE 1952z: 150 stations spotted on 160m FT8 RX with best DX 9K2HN (4567km).
UPDATE 2038z: Amazing!!! Not only was a recent 160m FT8 CQ to the earth-electrode "antenna" in the ground answered by a station in Germany, but I was spotted by 72 stations (in the last 6 hours) including VO1HP (3768km). This by far the most distant report I have ever had on 160m, but this was with my invisible antenna and QRP! The latter is the first report I have ever had from "across the pond" on 160m.
![]() |
| Stations spotting me this evening on 160m FT8 TX with 10W and the earth-electrode "antenna" |
Winter Es and 6m FT8
Turning on 6m FT8 RX just now, there is evidence of 6m Es with spots of stations in F and LZ. A 10W FT8 CQ was only spotted by 1 G though.
472kHz
People often avoid this band thinking they will need big antennas and extensive ground systems. Whilst these would certainly help, they are not necessary to achieve useful results, especially with WSPR.
With an ERP of less than 10mW from my earth-electrode "antenna" in the ground I get spotted in Norway most nights on WSPR.
I use my FT817ND and my transverter. The output from the transverter into 50 ohms is about 12W, but the measured ERP is only about 10mW (i.e. the "antenna" gain is about -32dB). A "proper" antenna and ground could be several dB more efficient. Most nights on 472kHz WSPR I get over 20 stations spotting me and on the better nights 30 stations! Neither my XYL or the neigbours are aware it is even being there!
This "antenna" also works pretty well on 160m. On 472kHz and 1840kHz it is an almost perfect match with a small 3C90 step-up transformer. At the old QTH I did not need this at all. I suspect it would be quite good on 137kHz TX, although I have not (yet) tried it on this band.
My theory is on LF and MF bands it works as a sort of loop in the ground. If this is correct, the loop would be bigger as you move down in frequency. It could even be quite effective at VLF.
WSPR does not really allow chats, but works with very weak signals. It is ideal for me on this band. From the old QTH I have had JT9 472kHz QSOs with stations in the UK and Belgium with a similar set-up at my QTH.
With an ERP of less than 10mW from my earth-electrode "antenna" in the ground I get spotted in Norway most nights on WSPR.
I use my FT817ND and my transverter. The output from the transverter into 50 ohms is about 12W, but the measured ERP is only about 10mW (i.e. the "antenna" gain is about -32dB). A "proper" antenna and ground could be several dB more efficient. Most nights on 472kHz WSPR I get over 20 stations spotting me and on the better nights 30 stations! Neither my XYL or the neigbours are aware it is even being there!
This "antenna" also works pretty well on 160m. On 472kHz and 1840kHz it is an almost perfect match with a small 3C90 step-up transformer. At the old QTH I did not need this at all. I suspect it would be quite good on 137kHz TX, although I have not (yet) tried it on this band.
My theory is on LF and MF bands it works as a sort of loop in the ground. If this is correct, the loop would be bigger as you move down in frequency. It could even be quite effective at VLF.
WSPR does not really allow chats, but works with very weak signals. It is ideal for me on this band. From the old QTH I have had JT9 472kHz QSOs with stations in the UK and Belgium with a similar set-up at my QTH.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





