Since lunchtime, there has been Es spots on 10m from Italy, France and Spain. All were spots of me, none of others. I am a bit surprised and wonder if it is WSPR-X was not uploading my spots of others? Looking at the WSPR screen there were a couple of signals that should have decoded and uploaded. I have now reverting to the standard WSPR software v2.12.
10m is easier than 6m for WSPR with Es is easier to find. Best Es DX today is 1336k.
UPDATE 1630z: Interestingly, within minutes of running the V2.12 software again, I decoded CX2ABP (11127km) running 5W by F2. He was -25dB S/N.This is a decent distance in line with solar predictions for today. At this strength, my 2W would be in the noise at his end. It may have just been co-incidental but it looks like V2.12 uploads everything whereas WSPR-X V0.3 r3058 maybe a little hit and miss? EA5CYA has also just been decoded OK. Odd no decodes all afternoon with WSPR-X but instant results reverting to V2.12. Maybe it is a Wn 8.1 issue? I'll be sticking with V2.12.
UPDATE 1725z: Yet more Es - EA4GDE now being spotted with 200mW. Since returning to V2.12 all spots have been of others.
Simple QRP projects, 10m, 8m, 6m, 4m, FT8, 160m, WSPR, LF/MF, sub-9kHz, nanowaves and other random stuff, some not related to amateur radio.
Buy me (a virtual) cup of coffee
This is NOT at all compulsory, but this would help offset some project costs.
Any donations most gratefully received.
https://ko-fi.com/rogerg3xbm
Any donations most gratefully received.
https://ko-fi.com/rogerg3xbm
Cookies
Google and others may use cookies on this blog and its ads. If you agree, please proceed as normal. Otherwise do not read this blog.
Featured post
10m QRP WSPR (Sunday)
My 500mW stand-alone 10m WSPR beacon has been on since this afternoon. So far, 13 stations have spotted me.
Links
Propagation
Total Pageviews
Blog Archive
-
►
2024
(2489)
- Dec 2024 (138)
- Nov 2024 (209)
- Oct 2024 (212)
- Sept 2024 (193)
- Aug 2024 (230)
- Jul 2024 (211)
- Jun 2024 (180)
- May 2024 (232)
- Apr 2024 (206)
- Mar 2024 (233)
- Feb 2024 (215)
- Jan 2024 (230)
-
►
2023
(2556)
- Dec 2023 (236)
- Nov 2023 (243)
- Oct 2023 (231)
- Sept 2023 (192)
- Aug 2023 (208)
- Jul 2023 (177)
- Jun 2023 (182)
- May 2023 (233)
- Apr 2023 (202)
- Mar 2023 (237)
- Feb 2023 (200)
- Jan 2023 (215)
-
►
2022
(2481)
- Dec 2022 (214)
- Nov 2022 (199)
- Oct 2022 (206)
- Sept 2022 (207)
- Aug 2022 (240)
- Jul 2022 (204)
- Jun 2022 (177)
- May 2022 (204)
- Apr 2022 (183)
- Mar 2022 (232)
- Feb 2022 (198)
- Jan 2022 (217)
-
►
2021
(2574)
- Dec 2021 (217)
- Nov 2021 (222)
- Oct 2021 (223)
- Sept 2021 (200)
- Aug 2021 (202)
- Jul 2021 (231)
- Jun 2021 (202)
- May 2021 (209)
- Apr 2021 (225)
- Mar 2021 (227)
- Feb 2021 (214)
- Jan 2021 (202)
-
►
2020
(2588)
- Dec 2020 (224)
- Nov 2020 (210)
- Oct 2020 (209)
- Sept 2020 (197)
- Aug 2020 (215)
- Jul 2020 (235)
- Jun 2020 (213)
- May 2020 (208)
- Apr 2020 (215)
- Mar 2020 (216)
- Feb 2020 (214)
- Jan 2020 (232)
-
►
2019
(2340)
- Dec 2019 (206)
- Nov 2019 (180)
- Oct 2019 (215)
- Sept 2019 (196)
- Aug 2019 (193)
- Jul 2019 (167)
- Jun 2019 (191)
- May 2019 (161)
- Apr 2019 (201)
- Mar 2019 (226)
- Feb 2019 (191)
- Jan 2019 (213)
-
►
2018
(2349)
- Dec 2018 (203)
- Nov 2018 (202)
- Oct 2018 (219)
- Sept 2018 (160)
- Aug 2018 (205)
- Jul 2018 (163)
- Jun 2018 (156)
- May 2018 (204)
- Apr 2018 (193)
- Mar 2018 (206)
- Feb 2018 (198)
- Jan 2018 (240)
-
►
2017
(2226)
- Dec 2017 (185)
- Nov 2017 (212)
- Oct 2017 (210)
- Sept 2017 (150)
- Aug 2017 (228)
- Jul 2017 (185)
- Jun 2017 (179)
- May 2017 (138)
- Apr 2017 (170)
- Mar 2017 (211)
- Feb 2017 (161)
- Jan 2017 (197)
-
►
2016
(2026)
- Dec 2016 (189)
- Nov 2016 (179)
- Oct 2016 (185)
- Sept 2016 (132)
- Aug 2016 (170)
- Jul 2016 (160)
- Jun 2016 (165)
- May 2016 (172)
- Apr 2016 (191)
- Mar 2016 (184)
- Feb 2016 (147)
- Jan 2016 (152)
-
►
2015
(1793)
- Dec 2015 (170)
- Nov 2015 (172)
- Oct 2015 (165)
- Sept 2015 (149)
- Aug 2015 (148)
- Jul 2015 (120)
- Jun 2015 (134)
- May 2015 (141)
- Apr 2015 (153)
- Mar 2015 (151)
- Feb 2015 (142)
- Jan 2015 (148)
-
▼
2014
(1415)
- Dec 2014 (152)
- Nov 2014 (147)
- Oct 2014 (151)
- Sept 2014 (130)
- Aug 2014 (140)
- Jul 2014 (139)
- Jun 2014 (147)
- May 2014 (109)
- Apr 2014 (86)
- Mar 2014 (65)
- Feb 2014 (60)
- Jan 2014 (89)
-
►
2013
(370)
- Dec 2013 (5)
- Nov 2013 (2)
- Oct 2013 (1)
- Sept 2013 (27)
- Aug 2013 (22)
- Jul 2013 (31)
- Jun 2013 (42)
- May 2013 (36)
- Apr 2013 (33)
- Mar 2013 (49)
- Feb 2013 (57)
- Jan 2013 (65)
-
►
2012
(425)
- Dec 2012 (45)
- Nov 2012 (59)
- Oct 2012 (48)
- Sept 2012 (32)
- Aug 2012 (23)
- Jul 2012 (27)
- Jun 2012 (30)
- May 2012 (32)
- Apr 2012 (22)
- Mar 2012 (43)
- Feb 2012 (40)
- Jan 2012 (24)
-
►
2011
(288)
- Dec 2011 (23)
- Nov 2011 (29)
- Oct 2011 (22)
- Sept 2011 (20)
- Aug 2011 (29)
- Jul 2011 (17)
- Jun 2011 (18)
- May 2011 (23)
- Apr 2011 (19)
- Mar 2011 (34)
- Feb 2011 (23)
- Jan 2011 (31)
-
►
2010
(459)
- Dec 2010 (33)
- Nov 2010 (18)
- Oct 2010 (21)
- Sept 2010 (42)
- Aug 2010 (28)
- Jul 2010 (27)
- Jun 2010 (46)
- May 2010 (46)
- Apr 2010 (34)
- Mar 2010 (46)
- Feb 2010 (47)
- Jan 2010 (71)
Followers
Visitor Locations
3 comments:
Your experience with WSPR-X is surprising to me. I've never once noticed it behave any differently to the older version as far as decodes and uploading goes. What is different, and might explain you experience, is that it uses the WSJT-X signal input system which allows you to alter the incoming gain. The level needs to be set to approximately the 30dB mark on the on-screen meter when there are no signals present.
Looking at the source code, it appears to me that the decode algorithm is the very same FORTRAN module from the older software.
However, WPSR-X is no longer developed, so I'm interested to try WSPR4 when it's ready.
David G0LRD
Actually, having just tried the beta WSPR4, if the only big change is band-hopping, I'm sticking with WSPR-X. I prefer the real time, wider-bandwidth waterfall and the WSJT-X style interface.
David
David, I can't be 100% sure the issue is with WSPR-X but V2.12 works well so I'll stick with it for now.
Post a Comment