

Simple QRP projects, 10m, 8m, 6m, 4m, FT8, 160m, WSPR, LF/MF, sub-9kHz, nanowaves and other random stuff, some not related to amateur radio.
Several times before, I have mentioned that I spent my early childhood in Salcombe, Devon, UK. At the time it was just home. We just took i...
2 comments:
That's very interesting, Roger. I would have said that WSPR was unsuitable for MS because it is a weak signal mode designed for relatively steady propagation whereas MS gives you short bursts of fairly strong signals. Therefore the 2 minute cycle is far to long for the average meteor burst. JT6M is not such a weak signal mode but it is designed to get the message across in a much shorter period taking advantage of short bursts. However the weak fuzzy wandering traces shown on the screenshot make MS a plausible explanation.
My theory is the Perseids shower would have given some very long bursts and maybe these were just long enough for a couple of WSPR transmissions to make it via the ionised trail. Or it could have been a short spor-E opening. It would be good to see a screenshot from F4VNS of my signals at 0250 and 0430. I note one has -3 drift which could be Doppler to some degree?
Post a Comment