JT65 QSO with 2E0ZRQ this evening on 160m |
13 Mar 2012
160m JT65 QSO with loft vertical
160m loft antenna diagram
Labels:
160m,
loft antenna,
marconi160m N,
vertical
12 Mar 2012
160m JT65
My 4 year old grandson having gone home now, I have my shack back again so am able to play amateur radio again. I've several things to catch up on including:
- Trying for a first 160m JT65 QSO.
- Measuring the performance of my ST-3 JRC headphones that AA1TJ managed to find for me recently.
- Another over-the-horizon 481THz test looking for G4HJW's beacon and my own.
- Testing my iPod Touch SpectrumView application with an external audio input.
8 Mar 2012
10m good despite the flare
Today all the propagation forecasts were showing poor conditions on HF. Despite this, 10m was well open this afternoon to the Middle East, Africa and South America with good signals received. My only QSO so far has been with JY5HX when running 5W CW here.
The lower part of 10m had several Russian (?) CB stations including one operating almost on 28.060MHz, the CW QRP frequency. Use it or lose it folks.
The lower part of 10m had several Russian (?) CB stations including one operating almost on 28.060MHz, the CW QRP frequency. Use it or lose it folks.
7 Mar 2012
160m JT65
As I appear to be having some success with WSPR on topband, I have decided to try JT65 on the band to see if I can manage a few QSOs.
UPDATE: after calling for around 15 minutes I gave up!
UPDATE: after calling for around 15 minutes I gave up!
Labels:
160m,
jt65. topband
My 160m WSPR analysis
Since erecting my tiny 160m loft mounted vertical this last weekend I've used it on WSPR a few evenings with great success. The following tables show the unique reports received and sent on the band using (mostly) 5W. Most stations copying me can be copied here, despite the horrendous noise issues on the band at night.
So far, reports have been received from 9 countries with best DX being 1007km. Not bad with an antenna which is essentially a 1m long coil, a couple of top capacity wires and about 3m of feed wire from the loft to the upstairs shack and tuned against my central heating system copper pipes as a ground.
160m WSPR reports received |
160m WSPR reports given |
6 Mar 2012
Elecraft KX3 manual
The soon to be released KX3 QRP transceiver |
5 Mar 2012
VLF test by OE3GHB
OE3GHB's VLF loading coil and transmitter |
3 Mar 2012
Mixed results on 160m
The small loft antenna for 160m has produced some impressive results tonight with spots from all over NW Europe of my QRP signal. Best was GM4SLV in Shetland at 5W and OZ7IT at 2W.
But the real reason for erecting the antenna was to allow QSOs on QRP AM over a 3km path to G6ALB so we could use topband for a talkback link when doing other tests. Now, at 9.30pm we went onto 1.973MHz AM to see how easy it would be. It wasn't easy at all! In fact it was very hard work copying even a few watts of AM. The killer is the noise floor that is around S9 both at Andrew's home and mine. On WSPR, with its much narrower bandwidth this is not such an issue, but on AM it ruins the band for what we'd intended. There is no way that 0.25W of AM would make it, certainly not easily with simple rigs as we'd planned. 10W would be OK, but that defeats the purpose. On 70cm AM (yes AM) we had armchair copy between us with about 1W. On 160m FM it was better copy until we dropped the power down and the signal was drowned by the QRN/QRM.
So, what will we do? There is now no point in continuing with the 160m AM transceivers as this isn't going to work at our noisy QTHs with QRP over 3km, sadly. The most probable choice will be 6m AM using my SixBox rig at my end.
The lower HF bands like 160m are radically different from 30 odd years ago when the noise floor was some 20-30dB lower.
But the real reason for erecting the antenna was to allow QSOs on QRP AM over a 3km path to G6ALB so we could use topband for a talkback link when doing other tests. Now, at 9.30pm we went onto 1.973MHz AM to see how easy it would be. It wasn't easy at all! In fact it was very hard work copying even a few watts of AM. The killer is the noise floor that is around S9 both at Andrew's home and mine. On WSPR, with its much narrower bandwidth this is not such an issue, but on AM it ruins the band for what we'd intended. There is no way that 0.25W of AM would make it, certainly not easily with simple rigs as we'd planned. 10W would be OK, but that defeats the purpose. On 70cm AM (yes AM) we had armchair copy between us with about 1W. On 160m FM it was better copy until we dropped the power down and the signal was drowned by the QRN/QRM.
So, what will we do? There is now no point in continuing with the 160m AM transceivers as this isn't going to work at our noisy QTHs with QRP over 3km, sadly. The most probable choice will be 6m AM using my SixBox rig at my end.
The lower HF bands like 160m are radically different from 30 odd years ago when the noise floor was some 20-30dB lower.
Labels:
160m,
AM,
noise floor,
qrp
160m loft antenna erected
160m loft antenna |
UPDATE: My first 2 WSPR reports on the new (indoor) antenna were from OZ7IT at 853kms! The antenna must work, HI. Shortly after PA0A spotted me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)