Whatever I did I could NOT get version V1.3 of K1JT's latest software to work on my PC. No decodes, zilch.
Reverting to V1.1 and success was sweet and immediate with a nice 20m JT9-1 QSO with RA9KT at 4309km. I still don't understand the problem with V1.3, but V1.1 is nearly the same and allows me to have JT9-1 QSOs on any HF/MF band I want.
UPDATE 1840z: In my ignorance I forgot to close the JT9-1 software and as a result my signals were spotted until a few minutes ago on both sides of the Atlantic on PSK Reporter. I have now closed the program and my apologies.
2 Mar 2014
WSJTX help!
I am still struggling with the latest JT9-1 and JT65 combined software (V1.3 from the Princeton University site) and getting absolutely NO decodes, despite good signals in the waterfall. Requests for help have been answered by a few, without success so far.
Again any help will be appreciated. I am using an FT817ND set on USER-U option in menu 26 (works fine with JT65HF and WSPR) , normal SSB filter, have internet time set every few minutes, a SignaLink USB audio interface and a windows XP laptop.
What am I doing that is so wrong? I can see my JT65 CQs are getting out all over the place on PSK Reporter, but until I can decode stations, I cannot have QSOs.
Help!
Again any help will be appreciated. I am using an FT817ND set on USER-U option in menu 26 (works fine with JT65HF and WSPR) , normal SSB filter, have internet time set every few minutes, a SignaLink USB audio interface and a windows XP laptop.
What am I doing that is so wrong? I can see my JT65 CQs are getting out all over the place on PSK Reporter, but until I can decode stations, I cannot have QSOs.
Help!
1 Mar 2014
Help please! JT9-1 and JT65HF
Today I downloaded the latest V1.3 JT9-1 ( and JT65) software from the Princeton University site. Although I can see my digital CQ calls are being received all over the place (looking at PSK reporter) I get ZERO decodes on the JT-9 screen although I can see plenty of JT9-1 signals at good strength on the waterfall. I cannot work out why no callsigns are decoded at all.
Settings for external audio and PTT VOX are as for WSPR, so interfaces to the SignaLink USB are fine. The FT817 is set to DIG with same settings as for WSPR (USB -U on PSK settings as for WSPR) and PSK31 works OK as I am getting QSOs.
Anyone care to suggest what (simple) things I may be doing wrong with JT9-1? It MUST be something VERY basic.
Settings for external audio and PTT VOX are as for WSPR, so interfaces to the SignaLink USB are fine. The FT817 is set to DIG with same settings as for WSPR (USB -U on PSK settings as for WSPR) and PSK31 works OK as I am getting QSOs.
Anyone care to suggest what (simple) things I may be doing wrong with JT9-1? It MUST be something VERY basic.
Labels:
jt9-1
More 160m QRP WSPR with 15m baseline earth-electrodes
Last evening and overnight I left the 160m 2W WSPR system running with the 15m baseline earth-electrode "antenna" to see what happened. The number of UNIQUE station spots of my signal has climbed to 17 in 8 different countries, with the best DX still just over 1000km to Sweden.On RX I have now spotted 11 uniques.
Having more or less completed all the WSPR tests I want to do for now with the present antennas, I shall now concentrate on 2-way modes that don't involve speaking (to save my poor voice) such as CW, PSK31, JT65HF and JT9-1.
17 unique spots in 8 countries with 2W and 15m earth-electrodes on 160m WSPR |
28 Feb 2014
Top Band on the 15m baseline earth-electrode "antenna"
Running the 2W from the PA (ERP not known but mWs likely) I received 12 unique spots overnight of my 160m WSPR signal with best DX report from SM6WZI (JO67mp) at 1007km, not at all bad going. At my end, I copied just 6 unique stations including SM6WZI as my best DX spot. My reports (of others) are not as good as their spots of me, suggesting my noise floor is higher than theirs?
At this point I am running out of WSPR "experiments" that I can do with the antennas already in place. You may recall my stroke is preventing ladder and antenna work outside presently. I could give 137kHz a go but will need a preamp building first. "Down the road" at the old QTH G8HUH was regularly able to copy me on 137kHz WSPR QRP to my 20m earth-electrode"antenna" at 250km. Main issue on 137kHz is there are few WSPR stations active usually.
Maybe I shall try some 2-way HF QSOs using CW, PSK31, JT65HF or JT9-1 instead? All the while I am trying to avoid speaking to save my poor voice!
At this point I am running out of WSPR "experiments" that I can do with the antennas already in place. You may recall my stroke is preventing ladder and antenna work outside presently. I could give 137kHz a go but will need a preamp building first. "Down the road" at the old QTH G8HUH was regularly able to copy me on 137kHz WSPR QRP to my 20m earth-electrode"antenna" at 250km. Main issue on 137kHz is there are few WSPR stations active usually.
Maybe I shall try some 2-way HF QSOs using CW, PSK31, JT65HF or JT9-1 instead? All the while I am trying to avoid speaking to save my poor voice!
27 Feb 2014
160m on 15m earth-electrode "antenna"
I have just started WSPR on 160m with the 15m baseline earth-electrode system, matching the "antenna" with just the Z817 auto-ATU. First TX burst resulted in 5 spots in 5 countries and best DX 633km. The system will run through the night and I'll report on results more fully tomorrow.
Labels:
160m,
earth-electrode,
wspr
New FT817ND with 250Hz CW filter
Today I fitted the 250Hz CW filter (bought at a competitive price from Greece on eBay) and have been using the new FT817ND on 40m and 10m WSPR. Everything seems to work well with the Z817 auto-ATU. What is amazing is that a single WSPR TX burst can give me up to 21 spots.
Labels:
250hz cw filter,
ft817nd,
z817
Even more on 80m QRP - 15m baseline earth-electrode antenna
I decided to leave my 2W 80m WSPR station running a little longer and the tally has now jumped to 24 spots of my own signal and 45 spots of other stations. The earth-electrode antenna is no " also ran" - it performs well on both TX and RX.
26 Feb 2014
OFCOM reply re: sub 8.3kHz and around 73kHz
| ||||
|
Your ref: 1-641-1681
Dear Roger,
Thank you for your email and apologies for the delay in responding.
There is no lower limit for the definition of ‘wireless telegraphy’ in the Wireless Telegraphy Act 2006, only an upper limit*
and we
unaware of any order changing that. Transmissions below 8.3 kHz would
still be covered by the WT Act and would need the relevant
authorisation, even if there is no Allocation available in the UK FAT.
As you are most likely wanting to do this under the authorisation
of your amateur radio licence, you would need to apply for a variation.
Unfortunately,
the UK amateur radio licence does not authorise use of 73 kHz and we do
not note it in any relevant exemption regulations, such as The Wireless
Telegraphy (Testing
and Development Under Suppressed Radiation Conditions) (Exemption)
Regulations 1989. So any intended operation(s) would also have to be the
subject of a variation.
If
you wish to approach Ofcom for a NoV we would need you to provide as
much information as possible. Information required would be things like
radiated power, frequency,
bandwidth, antenna type, height, NGR, whether directional (and, if so,
direction), elevation, class of emission and purpose of use. We may be
able offer a variation, but initially this would likely be for a
temporary period e.g. six months. However, there
is no guarantee that we can authorise this use. We also note that the
73 kHz band is UK2 and that means prior approval from the MoD would need
to be sought.
*“116 “Wireless telegraphy”.
(1)
In this Act “wireless telegraphy” means the emitting or receiving, over
paths that are not provided by any material substance constructed or
arranged for the purpose,
of energy to which subsection (2) applies. .
(2) This subsection applies to electromagnetic energy of a frequency not exceeding 3,000 gigahertz that— .
(a)
serves for conveying messages, sound or visual images (whether or not
the messages, sound or images are actually received by anyone), or for
operating or controlling
machinery or apparatus; or .
(b)
is used in connection with determining position, bearing or distance,
or for gaining information as to the presence, absence, position or
motion of an object or
of a class of objects. .
(3)
The Secretary of State may by order modify the definition of “wireless
telegraphy” by substituting a different frequency for the frequency that
is for the time
being specified in subsection (2). .
(4)
No order is to be made containing provision authorised by subsection
(3) unless a draft of the order has been laid before Parliament and
approved by a resolution
of each House”
We hope the above information helps.
Regards
Ash
:: Ash Gohil
Team Leader
Spectrum Licensing
Spectrum Operations
:: Ofcom
Riverside House
2a Southwark Bridge Road
London SE1 9HA
Labels:
ofcom,
sub-8.3kHz
Great success -80m WSPR with15m earth-electrodes
Last evening and overnight I left the 80m WSPR running using just the 15m E-W earth-electrode "antenna" and was well rewarded: best reception (here) was of a Canadian station and the best report of my own 2W was from Finland. In all, I received 20 unique spots in 9 countries with my best DX report from OH6GAP at 1852km. Reports are rarely what I would call marginal ones too.
On RX here, I spotted 34 unique stations in 12 countries with best DX VA3SK (running 2W from FN06jf) at 5514km. A decent distance on 80m.
The antenna certainly works OK on 80m as well as 630m. Next try will be on 160m, probably starting after lunchtime today.
80m 2W TX WSPR spots with 15m baseline E-W earth-electrode antenna |
The antenna certainly works OK on 80m as well as 630m. Next try will be on 160m, probably starting after lunchtime today.
Labels:
80m,
earth-electrodes,
wspr
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)