A new meteor scatter mode

http://www.dk5ew.de/2012/01/13/psk2k-a-new-meteorscatter-mode-by-dj5hg/

This webpage gives details of an interesting high speed MS mode from DK5EW. There is also a Yahoo group to discuss this: see http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/psk2k/

"PSK2k is high speed meteor scatter software written by Klaus DJ5HG (Prof. of Computer Science at University Hamburg).  It allows 2 way MS QSO’s to be conducted with any suitable transceiver/PC/soundcard combination.

PSK2k is fully error correcting and call specific in operation so you will only see the QSO in progress and any non-QSO CQ or QST text. All other transmissions (other people also in QSO) are discarded. This allows multiple QSO’s to take place on a single frequency.

PSK2k can be operated in fully automatic mode if required. This enables QSO’s to be completed fully automatically without user intervention. Important advantages are that long term testing can be done, on QRP power for instance, without having to sit an monitor every period."

Philips FM321 70cm mobile

The very first FM synthesised 70cm rig in the UK was made by Philips in Australia and was called the FM321. This 4W mobile was based on the very similar FM320 designed for the Australian UHF CB band. I owned an FM321 for a couple of years back in the early 1980s and really enjoyed using it on the UHF simplex channels and repeaters. Ergonomically it was excellent with simple up-down channel change and a decent volume control. It is a pity rigs are not made as simple as this today. No memories, no fuss.

From the home QTH and with just a hand rotated small vertical yagi I could work some impressive DX on FM on some days. That's the thing about 70cms: propagation changes within hours and often in very localised directions. When there was plenty of simplex activity it was very interesting watching propagation change and the maximum range change from maybe 30 miles to over 100.

WRC-12 Radio Conference (Jan 23 - Feb 17)

This most important international frequency revision conference takes place Jan 23th - Feb 17th. As always, the amateur service can never be certain of the outcome with a possibility of precious spectrum being lost to other services. However, this time there is a good chance that we will GAIN a new amateur MF band somewhere between  415 and 526.5kHz. The most likely outcome is a band near 480kHz around 8kHz wide. 8kHz of spectrum would allow much more experimentation, especially if this allocation was world-wide. This would supersede the special permits around 500kHz allocated in some countries.

Nice antenna for 80m QRP?

This is most definitely NOT my idea of amateur radio, but you can't fail to be impressed at the dedication of this Russian amateur to put out a big signal on 3.5MHz. This is a full sized 3 element yagi for 80m, meaning the driven element must be about 40m long.

Optical RX improvements

G8CYW Optical head (April 2011 RadCom)

I've now bought some NE5534 low noise op-amps so can implement the full G8CYW optical head circuit which many users have successfully adopted. Stuart describes this as "exquisitely sensitive". I have BPW34 PIN diodes but think the sensitivity should be similar to that with the SFH2030 diodes used in Stuart's design.

In the first instance I need to remeasure the noise floor with the optical head in total darkness to see if the changes indeed make it better than the current discrete component circuit.  My first quantitative noise measurements suggest far higher noise floor than I expected.

Assuming this gives improved performance over my 0.4km local "up the road" test range, my next step is to attempt a longer path, so I am looking for a path of around 2-3km to test with my baseband beacon. If this works with decent S/N then I'll retry looking for the GB3CAM optical beacon. At 32km this is a good test of system performance. At the test site at Nine Mile Hill the traffic noise was high (optically and audibly) so I also need to increase the signal level in the earpiece used to align the RX.

There is also soon to be a second optical beacon near Cambridge and this should be a little closer and an easier signal to find. However, I need to do tests before this is installed at Dry Drayton.

Incidentally, I managed to overcome the parallax issue in the optics alignment  so now a distant street light is spot on in the cross-hairs of the spotting scope.

FT-450D Hum (again)

From what I see and hear, Yaesu is still selling this otherwise excellent HF/6m transceiver with a fundamental design flaw: hum created by poor grounding of the display module when dimmed from maximum brightness. This problem was there on the FT450 but whatever improvement, if any, was implemented in the upgrade to the D version,  it has not worked consistently.  This really annoys me: surely this sort of issue should have been picked up in beta testing? The fix being implemented by many owners seems simple, so why the heck doesn't Yaesu get on a fix it?

OPERA (weak signal mode) - a word of warning

Since installing Opera V1.0.4 a few days ago my Inspiron 630m Win XP PC has started to behave very oddly. For years it has worked in a very stable fashion with very few issues in 6 years of use.  Now it is slow (very slow) even when not using OPERA, CPU load is high and running Ccleaner, which usually takes a minute, took nearly AN HOUR to get rid of 156M of files to be cleaned up.  Now, I cannot PROVE the link, but the coincidence is remarkable.

To make matters worse, the software once installed does not appear to be listed in the list to uninstall. Not being a PC expert I am loath to just remove all the obvious files in case this damn program has left something behind that "leaves its mark".

The lesson is DO NOT INSTALL DODGY, UNSTABLE AND POORLY WRITTEN SOFTWARE unless you know what you are doing and you know how to get rid of it safely and completely.

OPERA, as a weak signal mode is interesting, but I am VERY unhappy that it has messed up my good old faithful PC.

SAQ VLF 17.2kHz test 10.1.12

The historic Grimeton VLF transmission over Christmas on 17.2kHz had to be abandoned because of an equipment failure but Lars (SM6NM) says they are planning another test tomorrow (Tuesday Jan 10th) at 1330UTC.  The sequence will be "VVV VVV VVV DE SAQ SAQ SAQ" running for about 30 minutes and no message. No QSL cards will be issued this time. More details see www.alexander.n.se.  One possible receiver to use is SM6LKM's simple VLF SDR that can be downloaded from http://sites.google.com/site/sm6lkm/saqrx .

This was what they said about the Christmas failure:
 
"The reason for the trouble with SAQ on Christmas Eve was most probably a damaged fuse in the excitation circuit for the 500 V DC generator. The fuse was not completely blown but measured a very high resistance (150 ohm). When we lost the excitation current to the DC generator, we also lost the control current to the choke coils in the conductors to the main motor, and thereby the speed control of the alternator was lost.  It was confusing that the problem occurred exactly when we connected the running alternator to the antenna. We were actually on air a few seconds with decreasing frequency until the antenna was disconnected by the protection circuit in the speed control."

Optical setback (of sorts)

RX set-up at Nine Mile Hill on 481THz tonight

Flushed with my local successes (0.4km) last night, I decided to have a go at looking for the GB3CAM optical beacon 32km away from a local high spot where I know others have copied it sending its 1/15kHz FSK sub-carrier data at 481THz (red light). I set up in the daylight so I knew where to aim approximately and had the PC ready with SAQ receiver (0-22kHz SDR) and Spectran all ready. After dark I started to seriously hunt for the elusive signal    .....but with no success.

Failure can be put down to several possible causes:

1. Difficulty in aiming. Although I knew where to aim, I am uncertain that my spotting scope is correctly aligned on the 100mm optical head and that there is no parallax error. Looking for a very weak signal is therefore hard to start with.
2. Inadequate sensitivity in the optical head. Although I could hear the 50Hz buzz from every street light and house light locally, maybe there is another 6-12dB to be had in basic sensitivity in the optical head.
3. Inadequate volume on the recovered baseband audio. I was monitoring the "live" feed with just a crystal earpiece attached to the head and, although this is fine at home and down a quiet street, it was too low a level to hear weak signals over the traffic noise from the main road which adjoined the field gateway at the RX location.
4. Path loss. According to G4HJW, the beacon keeper, the signal varies from 5-30dB over noise at this location, assuming one is aligned correctly. Although the weather was cloudy and good visibility there was drizzle that came in as I was testing.
5. QRM from car headlights. As cars came along the main road near the test site, I got quite bad buzz from their headlights.

So, not to be beaten, I will do things to address all these problems and try again quite soon. I think I need a better local test beacon that I can use to (a) check aim, check RX sensitivity and adequacy of the recovered audio.

Quantitative tests with 481THz kit

Today, in daylight again, I did a repeat of my recent tests with the baseband pre-focused red LED TX (20mA), looking for the signal 0.2km along the road. This time I also took my PC and looked for the signal with Spectran and the SAQ SDR receiver. The audio tone was around 40-50dB over noise on both systems.  At this range I would have expected far better S/N. The noise floor looks high. When I blocked off the lens the noise floor went UP about 15dB. Why I wonder?  The picture shows the test set-up. If you click on the image you can see the pre-focused red LED pointing out of the house window and the receiving kit in the bottom foreground. Based on these results speech communication, even with just the same LED and no external lens on TX, should be possible to at least 5km. With 100mm lenses at the TX end, considerably further should be possible.  Below are the test results.

UPDATE: After dark I repeated the range test, just using the crystal earpiece to listen to the signal detected by the PIN diode head. At 0.4km, the greatest distance I could go line-of-sight from my home QTH, the audible signal was STRONG, which is very encouraging.

See my website https://sites.google.com/site/g3xbmqrp/Home/opticalcomms for more details and links.