At about 1830z I QSYed from 8m and instead went on 10m FT8 with 2W.
UPDATE 2021z: 10 stations have spotted me with the best PU2YFR (9602km). Now QRT.
Simple QRP projects, 10m, 8m, 6m, 4m, FT8, 160m, WSPR, LF/MF, sub-9kHz, nanowaves and other random stuff, some not related to amateur radio.
At about 1830z I QSYed from 8m and instead went on 10m FT8 with 2W.
UPDATE 2021z: 10 stations have spotted me with the best PU2YFR (9602km). Now QRT.
Already, I am thinking about 2026. Sunspots and solar activity should still be good although declining.
My instincts are to go mainly on 10m QRP FT8, although I shall go on 6m FT8 in which case I shall go on 10m WSPR wth my 500mW beacon that does not need the PC at the same time.
Still tempted by 8m, TX, although I think most of the activity would be in the Es season. If I was to reapply for a TX permit, I would time it to coincide with the Es season, so leave any new application until late March, so the permit would be in place in time for the Es season. I may decide not to bother.
There is no doubt that AI will have a huge impact on the lives of everyone in the future. It will get better and better and will have impacts for good and evil.
In many ways I have been impressed with AI. For example I asked it to colourise an old black and white photo of my dad in his RAF uniform during WW2. The colourisation was excellent.
On the downside I asked Gemini to "make a picture of Roger G3XBM" as an experiment. I tried this both in "fast" and "thinking" modes. On both attempts the person looked nothing at all like me. It created a radio shack (far more extensive than mine, HI) and a plaque with my callsign, but the person was totally wrong. I suppose it has to find a photo of me to learn from.
This is one of the dangers of AI. People may believe what they are being told. Often it will be correct. At the same time it can be very wrong! For now, it is best to treat AI with some caution knowing it can go "rogue" and give totally false results. It can only be as good as the sources it learns from.
I have QSYed to 8m FT8 RX on 40.680 MHz using my end-fed long wire. We'll see if I spot anyone today.
UPDATE 1626z: No spots. At the moment 8m is disappointing.
My beacon was turned on just after breakfast.
UPDATE 1016z: Just 2 stations in the Canary Isles spotting me so far.
My gear has been on since just after breakfast.
UPDATE 1914z: So far, spotted by 5 English stations.
Rather than 1 large Christmas tree we have 3 small ones. This one in the lounge we have had since 2019 and has fibre optic "leaves" and is always changing colour.
This is a contest I do not submit an entry for. I gave a few (very few!) CQ calls and was copied in southern Eire. There is no doubt there is a lots of activity.

Stations that spotted my 2m 10W FT8 this evening
UPDATE 2102z: Now QRT. Worked 4 stations in the 2m FT8 UKAC contest.
The QMX is a popular SOTA radio as it is very compact and works on SSB with a firmware update.
My gear (5W to the V2000 vertical omni) was turned on at about 1015z.
UPDATE 1324z: 18 spots so far. See map.
Really, this is too hard for me now.
After about 30 minutes I find my poor voice struggles these days in contests. I had to stop.
I worked a new square for 2025 in the form of JO03, but I really could not manage any longer.
Yesterday I had a very painful lesson. Google puts in SPAM things it thinks are SPAM. Usually it is correct .
The answer seems to be always check. I usually do see if anything is in SPAM by error, but his first email must have been deleted before I checked.
UPDATE Monday 1945z: Since writing this I had an email claiming illness and asking if I shopped at Amazon. Definitely SPAM!! Now back in SPAM! Caveat emptor. There really was a reason it was in SPAM.
My gear was turned on before breakfast.
UPDATE 0904z: 53 stations have spotted me.
Yesterday we went to a sung Advent service in the next village.
Near the start of the month my favourite site for solar data is updated. I have not checked yet but this is usually done early in the month. It is worth taking a peek so we can see how the cycle is progressing.
We are on the down-slope, but conditions on the higher HF bands are likely to remain good for a few years.
It is my view that with modes like FT8 we will find 10m open more than we thought.
This is a circuit for a VHF receiver that can be adjusted to decode SSB, CW and NBFM in addition to AM.
See https://www.arrl.org/files/file/Technology/tis/info/pdf/9712039.pdf .
Although the CB bands are just below the 10m amateur band it is often busy on CB when 10m seems dead. This suggests it is a lack of activity rather than poor conditions. Hopefully FT8 will help to show us 10m is still good on some paths.
In the meantime, it may be worth keeping an eye on the CB bands.
Late Sunday, I went on 6m FT8 with 5W to the V2000 vertical omni antennas. 5 English stations spotted me. Now QRT.
Over many years, I have had most fun on 10m. Initially, I was on SSB, AM and FM on that band with a low wire dipole. Of course, on 10m antennas are small and CB antennas usually work.
These days, because of my poor voice following my 2013 stroke, I use digital modes like FT8 and WSPR mostly.
DXCC was worked on 10m QRP SSB with a simple wire dipole over 40 years ago, so DX chasing is no longer important. I am more interested to see where my QRP is reaching. That's one of the joys of our hobby: there are so many different ways to enjoy it.
Before my stroke I enjoyed experimenting. I still do, but restrict myself to what I can do at home that does not require soldering or fine motor skills!
Thanks to DX Explorer, I was pointed to the website of LA6NCA who is a true experimenter. I had not visited his site before. It also looks like he has a good range of test gear. Certainly a site for inspiration.
Just now I was watching a video on this website. Then I realised it was derived from one of my designs! I am flattered and hope he really has fun. He is eventually making a tiny PCB for it.
Today, I am on 8m FT8 RX, more in hope than expectation, using my end-fed long wire antenna. I have no idea of the polar plot on 8m, but it has been used to copy CT, EA and G on 8m FT8.
UPDATE 1455z: No spots.
We think of time as absolute, but we experience time differently when we sleep deeply and indeed as we age. It may be that our understanding of time is totally wrong.
Some years ago I tried WSPR on this band.
As I recall I used the coax up to my 2m big-wheel antenna and a mains ground. It worked and I got quite a few reports. The auto-ATU in the rig was used to match the random antenna.
Unfortunately, this part of the spectrum is controlled by the military in the UK. As a result, the UK has a fragmented set of allocations and has never adopted the WARC allocation. Although we are allowed more power and more spectrum, I personally would prefer a contiguous, if narrower, allocation at lower power.
To me, it is all too confusing. I suspect many do not use the band because they are confused by the allocations. There is a band plan on the RSGB site.
Although at 3.2mW I can see my 2m FT8 signal at the grabber at G0LRD, at 26km I cannot see myself on PSKreporter. I shall increase my power until I am I decoded.
UPDATE 1815z: Increased to 6.4mW. No decode.
UPDATE 1829z: Increased to 12mW. Decode appeared on PSKreporter (just).
UPDATE 1837z: Increased to 25mW. Decoding, but not reliably. I think both G0LRD and I have big-wheel omni antennas.
UPDATE 1900z: Increased power to 35mW. No decodes this time.
UPDATE 1917z: Increased power to 45mW. No decodes.The other variable is S/N at the RX. What I am looking for is what level I need to get reliable and repeatable decodes.
UPDATE 1928z: Increased power to 55mW. It would appear that I am being defeated by local noise. No decodes.
UPDATE 1940z: Increased power to 60mW. No decodes.
UPDATE 1958z: Increased power to 65mW. 2 people now spotting me.
UPDATE 2117z: Increased power to 100mW. A surprise QSO with M0WDN at 100mW with a 15dB attenuator in the input of the RX!! The S/N at G0LRD seems to vary widely suggesting he was pointing a beam in a different direction. I have now gone QRT.
In all the years I have been involved in amateur radio (it started in 1961!) my main interest has been QRP (low power).
In recent years the local noise level especially in urban areas has gone up, mainly because we have more gadgets and chargers. These often use switched mode power supplies which can produce a lot of noise. Taken together these can increase the noise floor. The result is weak signals can be buried in the noise.
Sadly, this means QRP operation can be harder.
The problem is not so much the low power but the noise floor at the receiving end. If you have an electrically quiet QTH, you can still dig these signals out. Such sites are becoming rarer.
Probably there is a power below which it gets much harder. At very low power it is easy to be clobbered by a stronger station as well.
Thinking of the future, I suspect 5W QRP will be a good choice.
Some times (many times actually) I question the motives of US President Trump.
Allegedly, he has just pardoned the former president of Honduras who was jailed for 45 years on drug trafficking charges. I find this at odds with the "make America great again" movement and keeping drugs out.
Many Americans voted for him, so I would be interested to hear their views.
At 1217z, I changed from 100mW 15m WSPR to 15m 100mW FT8. Now, FT8 is about 10dB worse than WSPR, but there is more activity on FT8 these days.
UPDATE 1340z: Just. one spot of me by SP9WTC (1480km). Maybe I am being clobbered by a stronger station? Also, I suspect it is increasingly likely that QRP signals are now buried in noise, making QRP operation harder than it once was. Even with a 15dB attuenuator in circuit right next to the rig I am spotting 119 stations. This suggests an effective power of low watts if they were running 100W.
UPDATE 1708z: Well it helps if you use a 15m antenna! I discovered I was using my 2m big-wheel antenna rather than my end fed HF antenna. So I am surprised to have got any spots with 100mW 15m FT8.
It is a sleepy village on a rare "hill" overlooking the fen.
For a complete change I am trying 15m 100mW WSPR.
UPDATE 1117z: Just 6 spots from a station in Austria. These days, although less sensitive, there seems to be far more activity on FT8 than WSPR.
UPDATE 1212z: Still just 6 spots of me from OE3GBB/Q (1233km). If I was starting out, I think you are more likely to have success with QRPP on FT8 rather than WSPR. QSYed to FT8.
With all the political uncertainty around at the moment, it would appear the UK is moving back more towards Europe. I think this makes sens...