My QRPP 10m WSPR is on again, although I have not had any reports for a few days. I just leave it running ...... in hope!
The fact I got any reports at all amazed me.
UPDATE 1845z: No spots.
Simple QRP projects, 10m, 8m, 6m, 4m, FT8, 160m, WSPR, LF/MF, sub-9kHz, nanowaves and other random stuff, some not related to amateur radio.
My QRPP 10m WSPR is on again, although I have not had any reports for a few days. I just leave it running ...... in hope!
The fact I got any reports at all amazed me.
UPDATE 1845z: No spots.
My 2.5W 6m FT8 to the vertical omni V2000 antenna has been on since about 1030z. So far, 8 English stations have spotted me.
UPDATE 1425z: 10 stations have spotted me so far and 3 stations have been spotted here.
UPDATE 1601z: 12 stations have spotted me today.
For many years, I have advocated a tiny amateur allocation around 40.680MHz primarily for radio science research. Here in the UK, the RSGB seems dead set against this, whereas in some countries an allocation has been made.
Frankly, I think the RSGB's position is stupid.
Surely the main purpose of amateur radio is research and self training. In the UK, if we want do research at 8m it costs us £50 annually unless we keep to ISM powers (10mW ERP).
The latest excuse is space radar to help investigate climate change, yet the latest WARC says:
"that spaceborne radars are intended to be operated only in either uninhabited or sparsely populated areas of the globe, with particular focus on deserts and polar ice fields, and only at night-time from 3 a.m. to 6 a.m. locally."
Surely the RSGB could put a good case to OFCOM for a few kHz in the ISM 8m band, NoV, limited power and modes, by application only, no-interference...
Is this likely? Probably not.
Instead we can go on 80m with 1kW, with commercial gear to talk about gardening. Am I annoyed? Yes.
RSGB - wake up!!
An eHam.com review will have to wait until I have really got to grips with it. My first impressions are that it is a sensiitve on 2m and 70m as my FT817ND, but more artifacts than I was expecting.
It is hard to compare these two as I run 500mW on WSPR and about 5W on FT8 from the IC-705. However FT8 is about 10dB less sensitive than WS...