Last evening and night were quite successful on 630m WSPR RX considering my poor setup (see table). In all, some respectable DX on multiple occasions.
The overarching message is that even very poor setups work on 630m WSPR RX.
Simple QRP projects, 10m, 8m, 6m, 4m, FT8, 160m, WSPR, LF/MF, sub-9kHz, nanowaves and other random stuff, some not related to amateur radio.
The overarching message is that even very poor setups work on 630m WSPR RX.
My gear was turned on at about 1825z (coax to 2m big-wheel via ATU and a mains earth).
UPDATE 2010z: So far, 5 stations have been spotted with the best OH6OHX (1736km).
This evening I am monitoring 630m WSPR. Hopefully this evening I have the settings right!
UPDATE 1900z: 3 spots by DC0DX (467km). It works!
Last night I tried monitoring 630m WSPR. Not a single station copied that suggests something was wrong.
UPDATE 0853z: Yes, wrong audio source selected. I may try again tonight.
Last evening and overnight I was on 630m WSPR using my coax to my 2m big-wheel antenna via an ATU and a mains earth.
In all, 5 stations were spotted with the best Norway. See table, and map by Phil VK7JJ.UPDATE 1036z: My darn Windows PC wanted me to "finish setting up my PC" and turned off WSPRnet and WSPR-X so was probably off through much of the night.Last evening and overnight I tried 630m WSPR RX using my earth-electrode "antenna" in the ground.
There were fewer stations received and the reports were weaker than the night before when I was using the coax up to my 2m big-wheel via an ATU.
It is hard to be categorical as conditions might have been different, the antennas better in some directions, etc..
My overall conclusion, with these caveats, is that the earth electrode was, at worse, about 1 S point inferior to the antenna used on the night before. I would expect this to be somewhat down on an antenna optimised for the band. So, maybe just 2 S points down. Considering the total lack of hassle, it is far from bad.
This evening and overnight I am on 630m WSPR RX with the Zachtek RX using instead my earth electrode "antenna" in the ground to see how this compares with the coax to my 2m big-wheel via an ATU
Although more expensive, I preferred to buy from Zachtek in Sweden although I know there is a Chinese copy of the Zachtek TX and probably the RX now.
Overnight I monitored 630m WSPR. Again, 5 stations were spotted with the best OH1LSQ (1733km) and an LA.
The impression I am getting is the IC705 is a few dB more sensitive than my Zachtek WSPR RX. At the moment I am monitoring 630m WSPR RX using my IC-705.
For a total change, I am on 474.2kHz WSPR RX using the coax up to my 2m big-wheel antenna tuned via a ferrite rod ATU and a mains plug earth.
UPDATE 1826z: DC0DX (467km) spotted. This rubbish set-up works!
UPDATE 1916z: Back on 472kHz WSPR RX. DC0DX copied 5dB stronger.
Once again I may try 630m WSPR RX overnight. It will be interesting to see if any new stations are spotted.
UPDATE 1808z: My 630m WSPR RX was turned on. G1GKN (54km) spotted.
Before my 2013 stroke I enjoyed 481THz optical tests over the horizon. What surprised me at first was that, even when absolutely nothing was...