Roger,
This is a project we've been working together with Willoh (LW3DYL) which fits partially into your quest for an extremely low cost and easy to build rig ("UKP 20 decent HF...") although not using the low tech approach but the other way around.The design is still being debugged and more simplifications will be attempted (such as a more simpler TR/RX switch and eliminate the 7474 based quadrature filter replacing it by an RC approach. The net result should be a one IC and 4 transistors design plus PA final.The design uses an USB power source (out of an inexpensive cell phone switching power supply or straight out of the USB port at the PC) having 0.5W with it; more like 1W with +12V.Main software platform will be a modified version of KGKSDR. Main use should be CW or SSB although no reason why not to use it with PSK or FreeDV or WSPR.Should fit on a (small) pocket.Main limitation so far is available time from the builders to devote to the project.73 de Pedro LU7HZ
Dr. Pedro E. Colla
Va.Belgrano-Ciudad de Cordoba
Cordoba- Argentina"La vida no es esperar a que pase la tormenta, es aprender a bailar bajo la lluvia". Anonimo
14 Jun 2013
Low costs SSB "Pixie" from Argentina
Pedro LU7HZ has sent me an update on work in Argentina on a low cost approach to an HF QRP SSB transceiver using very few parts. Basically they are using simple electronics coupled with an SDR approach to the modulation and demodulation process. My own approach would be the fully low tech approach (for a CW/DSB rig) but Pedro's approach is innovative and worth watching. I hope he produces kits or, at the least, documentation to allow others to duplicate the idea as it comes to fruition.
Labels:
qrp,
sdr,
simple sideband
Finningley optical transceiver progress
In the last couple of days, armed with my wife's close-up reading glasses, a magnifying glass, tweezers and a fine tipped soldering iron, I have been doing the SMA build of G4HJW's "Finningley" optical transceiver kit, designed to be used with 100mm optics (drain pipe and Poundland lenses!).
Bernie's instructions were first class with all the SMA parts for the receiver and the transmitter being organised sequentially with a clear layout diagram showing where each part has to be placed. It seems to have gone together very well with no snags, although I have still to add a few discrete parts including the LED and the PIN photodiode before testing can start. All being well, I should be able to start testing on Sunday as I am tied up with our church fete tomorrow.
The G4HJW designed optical transceiver |
Labels:
481thz,
finningley,
g4hjw
11 Jun 2013
Efficient electrically short antennas
Way back in my early professional life I was responsible for the design and implementation of a tiny 70cm antenna that had to fit inside the Pye PF8 UHF handportable transceiver. The mechanical design team had left virtually no space for the plate antenna we had intended, so yours truly had to come up with a solution that both fitted and worked efficiently. I managed it by changing the plate antenna to a skeleton plate antenna. In the end it worked very well but the tuning was VERY sharp. Reference here should be made the Wheeler and the Chu limit that defines the bandwidth that an efficient electrically short antenna can achieve.
Basically the thing to remember is this: the smaller the antenna is the higher the Q, and the narrower the bandwidth is, for efficient operation. This is why magnetic loops can work well if designed with a very very high unloaded Q and why they have a very narrow bandwidth if working efficiently. It also explains why a short loaded antenna will have a narrower bandwidth if working efficiently. Dr Underhill has argued that a small magnetic loop actually violates the Chu limit.
There is a good analysis of small antennas at http://www.m0rzf.talktalk.net/RobCentral/E.S.Antenna.html which goes into some of the maths and looks at various electrically small antennas. Some are "snake oil" of course, but some well designed ones do work with the caveat of narrow bandwidth e.g. well designed magnetic loops.
What is the interest in all this for me today? Well, I am still thinking about HF operation at the new QTH and how to meet my goals of a small, low visual impact antenna, that works well. One thing in my favour is I tend to operate on quite small parts of the HF bands e.g. around the WSPR/PSK frequencies or around the QRP frequencies. As long as I am prepared to stay close to certain frequencies like 28.1246MHz I should be able to design a very small efficient antenna. I already know that a magentic loop antenna works very well indeed and would certainly meet my goals.
Basically the thing to remember is this: the smaller the antenna is the higher the Q, and the narrower the bandwidth is, for efficient operation. This is why magnetic loops can work well if designed with a very very high unloaded Q and why they have a very narrow bandwidth if working efficiently. It also explains why a short loaded antenna will have a narrower bandwidth if working efficiently. Dr Underhill has argued that a small magnetic loop actually violates the Chu limit.
There is a good analysis of small antennas at http://www.m0rzf.talktalk.net/RobCentral/E.S.Antenna.html which goes into some of the maths and looks at various electrically small antennas. Some are "snake oil" of course, but some well designed ones do work with the caveat of narrow bandwidth e.g. well designed magnetic loops.
What is the interest in all this for me today? Well, I am still thinking about HF operation at the new QTH and how to meet my goals of a small, low visual impact antenna, that works well. One thing in my favour is I tend to operate on quite small parts of the HF bands e.g. around the WSPR/PSK frequencies or around the QRP frequencies. As long as I am prepared to stay close to certain frequencies like 28.1246MHz I should be able to design a very small efficient antenna. I already know that a magentic loop antenna works very well indeed and would certainly meet my goals.
Labels:
chu,
small antenna,
underhill,
wheeler
10 Jun 2013
Gardening at the new QTH
This evening I've been busy laying some additional turf in the back garden at our new (soon) QTH. About 5sq m of additional lawn was laid with about the same again to be added in the coming weeks. The bundalow is still a bit of a mess with lots of building work ongoing. The new back garden is around 70 feet wide, so an end-fed 1/4 wave for 80m should be possible. Tomorrow evening I hope to plant a new tree in the lawn to provide some screening from the neighbours. There is a lot of gardening to do to get the place looking as we would like, but it is coming on OK.
I am still deciding what to do about amateur radio and antennas at the new QTH. I dislike large and unsightly antennas, so whatever I do it is likely to be something stealth like. Whatever, it will be a whole new set of challenges to enjoy. At least I shall have a purpose built shack in which I can both operate and build, unlike the present QTH, with a nice view down the length of the back garden.
Incidentally I bought the turf out in the fens - much cheaper than the garden centre. It did involve driving my car into the middle of a large 100 acre field to collect it though (see RHS).
I am still deciding what to do about amateur radio and antennas at the new QTH. I dislike large and unsightly antennas, so whatever I do it is likely to be something stealth like. Whatever, it will be a whole new set of challenges to enjoy. At least I shall have a purpose built shack in which I can both operate and build, unlike the present QTH, with a nice view down the length of the back garden.
Incidentally I bought the turf out in the fens - much cheaper than the garden centre. It did involve driving my car into the middle of a large 100 acre field to collect it though (see RHS).
Labels:
new qth
The Low Power SPRATbook.
http://www.rsgbshop.org/acatalog/ |
Perhaps I should also mention that my 14 component 80m CW transceiver is one of the articles. But don't let that put you off! The circuit works well and G3XIZ worked GM with his version (despite running only about 18mW) and was copied on Switzerland.
9 Jun 2013
PY1RO on 6m CW - real DX reception!
The magic band (6m) is full of surprises. I came into the shack this evening after gardening most of the day up at our new bungalow to hear some signals on 6m WSPR. Rather than decode, I tuned down to the DX portion of the band to hear PY1RO (GG87lb Brazil) coming through at 559 on CW on 50.108MHz at a distance of 9369km. I was copying him on the V2000 vertical and my FT817 with a long lossy feeder. A few minutes later and he had faded out completely! Although I called him a couple of times, I did not break the pile-up, not that I was really expecting to, HI. Still, it was good to hear my best DX on the band in some years. At this time of year the propagation is more likely to be multi-hop Es rather than TEP I believe. Here is a video of PY1RO on 6m (not this occasion though).
Labels:
6m,
magic band,
py1ro
8 Jun 2013
G4HJW "Finningley" Optical Transceiver kit
The G4HJW optical transceiver kit |
Exactly when I'll get my kit built I'm not sure but it will be good to have one of these available for optical line-of-sight tests in the autumn. Once assembled, I shall be looking for some 2-way optical QSOs beyond the 10km speech contact I achieved with my own kit last summer. In East Anglia, the issue is finding some hills to allow long line-of-sight paths.
Bernie is, I understand, considering putting together a further batch of these kits, which make a good introduction to nanowave communications. In addition to these electrical kits, all that is needed is a microphone, headset and some simple optics than can be built for a few pounds.
See http://www.earf.co.uk/nanotrx.htm for more details
Labels:
finningley,
g4hjw,
kit,
nanowave,
optical,
transceiver
Yaesu price drop
http://www.universal-radio.com/ |
Labels:
exchange rate,
prices,
yaesu,
yen
Playing with a ferrite rod at VLF
Just for amusement, but with a slight hope it might work, I tried resonating a LW ferrite rod coil (about 3.5mH) at 8.97kHz to see how it might perform as a miniature portable receiving loop in my earth-mode tests.
To test other antennas and VLF preamps, I first connect my 8.97kHz 5W transmitter into a resistive dummy load and check that I can detect the signal strongly some distance away locally (about 10m away only). The emissions from the cables are such that this gives me around 30-40dB S/N on Spectran with the usual settings on my 80cm loop. Switching over to the ferrite rod RX antenna it was hard to tell if a signal was there at all.
So, that's one experiment I'll close and report as a failure. Had it worked, even 10s of dB down, it might have made a magnetic field antenna that could have been deployed mobile. You may recall I tried /M on 8.97kHz a few months ago with my 80cm loop strapped behind the car, until someone pointed out this probably would have invalidated my car insurance and I stopped. I had vague ideas of dropping the VLF resonated ferrite rod close to the ground behind, somehow fixed from the rear bumper.
Ho hum, another idea bites the dust.
To test other antennas and VLF preamps, I first connect my 8.97kHz 5W transmitter into a resistive dummy load and check that I can detect the signal strongly some distance away locally (about 10m away only). The emissions from the cables are such that this gives me around 30-40dB S/N on Spectran with the usual settings on my 80cm loop. Switching over to the ferrite rod RX antenna it was hard to tell if a signal was there at all.
So, that's one experiment I'll close and report as a failure. Had it worked, even 10s of dB down, it might have made a magnetic field antenna that could have been deployed mobile. You may recall I tried /M on 8.97kHz a few months ago with my 80cm loop strapped behind the car, until someone pointed out this probably would have invalidated my car insurance and I stopped. I had vague ideas of dropping the VLF resonated ferrite rod close to the ground behind, somehow fixed from the rear bumper.
Ho hum, another idea bites the dust.
Labels:
8.97khz,
ferrite rod,
vlf
6 Jun 2013
Shortwave Radio Archive
Just spotted on the Southgate site that K4SWL is creating a website to archive shortwave broadcast recordings before these disappear. Already many SW BC stations have closed at least parts of their services. The HF broadcast bands are nothing like they were even 20 years ago. See http://shortwavearchive.com/ .
My shortwave radio experience started over 50 years ago listening to SW broadcast stations on a simple crystal set in my bedroom. As much as I hated the propaganda from the communist broadcasters like Radio Moscow and Radio Sofia, Bulgaria, I do miss them and their evocative interval signals.
See also https://sites.google.com/site/g3xbmqrp3/hf/interval and take a nostalgic trip down memory lane.
My shortwave radio experience started over 50 years ago listening to SW broadcast stations on a simple crystal set in my bedroom. As much as I hated the propaganda from the communist broadcasters like Radio Moscow and Radio Sofia, Bulgaria, I do miss them and their evocative interval signals.
See also https://sites.google.com/site/g3xbmqrp3/hf/interval and take a nostalgic trip down memory lane.
Labels:
interval signals,
k4swl,
shortwave
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)