This evening G3WCB (101km) reported my 137.5kHz WSPR signal for the first time bringing my total number of reports on this more difficult band up to 10. My ERP is currently around 500-600uW, although I hope to run the transverter PA from around 20V tomorrow which should increase the ERP by around 3dB.
These are the reporters so far:
G6ALB
G3WCD
M0FMT
G3XIZ (46km)
G3XVL (69km)
M0BMU (69km)
G3WCB (101km)
G3YXM (148km)
M0PPP (182km)
GW0EZY (251km)
12 Nov 2011
10 Nov 2011
137kHz WSPR - big SUCCESS at last!
After yesterday's disappointments today has been a whole lot better on 137.5kHz with my best WSPR DX report ever and a report from my second DXCC country on the band. First several reports from GW0EZY in mid-Wales (251km) and then one from M0PPP in the north of England (off the side of my TX loop too - 182km) who I heard last night for the first time. I've copied him several times tonight as well as PA3EGO. The transverter now puts out about 20W, but the ERP is still only around 200uW based on the loop current and enclosed area. I'm tempted to put it in a box at last as I now know this system is capable of decent range on a good night like tonight.
9 Nov 2011
Struggling on 137kHz - time to move on?
Today I did some changes to my 137kHz transverter and put it on the air this evening for about 4 hours sending and receiving 137.5kHz WSPR. Power from the PA is now around 20W and the ERP must be around 200uW. I was really quite hopeful that, with enough stations active on WSPR tonight, I might get a few reports. The band was indeed quite busy with a few stations like G0KTN and G3WCB who have regularly copied my 500kHz WSPR on the band and looking. What a disappointment! Not only did I get not a single report, but I was unable to copy any of the active TX stations like F5WK or M0PPP. The latter was visible as a trace but not strong enough to decode.
Without increasing the power another 6dB at least to around 80W and improving the antenna considerably I am now of the opinion that, QRSS30 apart, 137kHz is not going to be a success. My feeling is I need at least 20-30dB better system performance (TX power and antenna efficiency that is) to even start to approach the level of reports I manage on 500kHz. So, do I try just that bit more or do I throw in the QRP towel on this band? I don't want to run lots of power and I don't want to erect a monster antenna: I was hoping my unobtrusive loop would have done me as well as it did on 500kHz, but clearly not.
I am beginning to think that this really IS a band where you need lots of power to make a success of things.
UPDATE: Just as I finished writing this I manage to decode M0PPP twice at 182km.
2252 -27 -0.5 0.137562 1 M0PPP IO93 17
Without increasing the power another 6dB at least to around 80W and improving the antenna considerably I am now of the opinion that, QRSS30 apart, 137kHz is not going to be a success. My feeling is I need at least 20-30dB better system performance (TX power and antenna efficiency that is) to even start to approach the level of reports I manage on 500kHz. So, do I try just that bit more or do I throw in the QRP towel on this band? I don't want to run lots of power and I don't want to erect a monster antenna: I was hoping my unobtrusive loop would have done me as well as it did on 500kHz, but clearly not.
I am beginning to think that this really IS a band where you need lots of power to make a success of things.
UPDATE: Just as I finished writing this I manage to decode M0PPP twice at 182km.
2252 -27 -0.5 0.137562 1 M0PPP IO93 17
7 Nov 2011
Simple VLF Receiver
SM6LKM's excellent PC based VLF receiver |
6 Nov 2011
A good night on 500kHz WSPR
Not bad for 2mW ERP on 500kHz and a smallish wire loop antenna! |
I really must make an effort to get the 137kHz WSPR activity stirring. Maybe if I can get my ERP up this next week I'll swap over to that band for a few nights and see what turns up. Mind you, the WSPR activity on 137kHz is very low currently with most people using QRSS beaconing.
The "Chirpy" 14 parts QRP 10m transceiver video
5 Nov 2011
Elecraft KX3 or FT817 successor?
For some time now we've been expecting the successor to the FT817 to appear on the market as the current offering is now over 10 years old, with just a minor update in this period. Sunspots are rising fast now and I'd expect Yaesu-Vertex to release this within 6 months or miss a big window of opportunity. The potential sales volumes are very large indeed as a large part of the amateur community owns an FT817 and would aspire to upgrade.
One wonders how Yaesu-Vertex is viewing the Elecraft KX3 and whether any changes to their new product will be made as a result of the KX3 pre-release data. The KX3 does look impressive but its form factor may not appeal to many. It also looks very "square" and Elecrafty! Although it can be used handheld, I understand you have to plug in a local microphone for example - a bit clunky for true handheld portable use, although you need an external mic with the FT817.
It is widely assumed that an FT817 successor will have a Li-Ion battery pack (2hr charge), built-in wide range auto ATU, good DSP features and possibly 70MHz coverage. The form factor is unlikely to be very much different from the current model, but with more inside.
Does anyone have any inside knowledge of Yaesu's release plans? If they don't get a move on the KX3 will steal the show. The KX3 is due to be released at the end of 2011 and order placement is starting very soon.
One wonders how Yaesu-Vertex is viewing the Elecraft KX3 and whether any changes to their new product will be made as a result of the KX3 pre-release data. The KX3 does look impressive but its form factor may not appeal to many. It also looks very "square" and Elecrafty! Although it can be used handheld, I understand you have to plug in a local microphone for example - a bit clunky for true handheld portable use, although you need an external mic with the FT817.
It is widely assumed that an FT817 successor will have a Li-Ion battery pack (2hr charge), built-in wide range auto ATU, good DSP features and possibly 70MHz coverage. The form factor is unlikely to be very much different from the current model, but with more inside.
Does anyone have any inside knowledge of Yaesu's release plans? If they don't get a move on the KX3 will steal the show. The KX3 is due to be released at the end of 2011 and order placement is starting very soon.
500kHz humming tonight
WSPR reception at G3XBM tonight - busy on 500kHz! |
Another 10m QRP transceiver built
Yesterday I built another simple 10m CW QRP transceiver. This is similar to the Tenner on my website with some improvements. This time the power out is QRO (well 600mW!) and the receiver a direct conversion one built around an SBL1 with passive LP audio filter and 3 stages of audio gain. The VXO, run from a regulated 5V supply, uses a fundamental 28.060MHz crystal which pulls from 28.040-28.070MHz with a sensible RX-TX offset (happens automatically) of around 800-1000Hz. Chirp is better than the simple XBM10-2 as the VXO is better regulated and the PA is a separate stage. Yesterday I worked RZ3QZ before the RX was finished and got reports on the reverse beacon network from W3OA. This morning a full 2-way QSO with UR5IDU (him 579 me 549).
UPDATE 1520z Nov 5th: This rig is working very well with 7 two-way QSOs on 10m CW in the log already since 1140z today. There is a Russian contest and the band is busy with Russian stations. Reports are all 599 of course but no repeats needed so far.
UPDATE 1520z Nov 5th: This rig is working very well with 7 two-way QSOs on 10m CW in the log already since 1140z today. There is a Russian contest and the band is busy with Russian stations. Reports are all 599 of course but no repeats needed so far.
2 Nov 2011
Chirpy (XBM10-2) improvements
28MHz "Chirpy" Transceiver with tuned antenna match |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)