These are two digital modes I have never tried. The former is faster than FT8, but less sensitive. JS8Call allows chatting with a keyboard, but is basically the same as FT8. JS8Call is meant for real communications.
18 Apr 2025
15 Aug 2024
FT8/FT4 and very brief Es openings
Up to now I have always used FT8 rather than FT4, especially with QRP. FT4 is quicker, but not as sensitive as FT8. I can imagine with Es out of season, FT4 might catch some openings that FT8 might miss.
This would apply for other types of propagation too where very brief openings might occur. I can imagine some F2 DX openings might be very fleeting. FT4 might catch these. I am not sure how many monitor FT4, but I imagine far fewer than FT8.
One useful future WSJT-X enhancement would be automatic detection of FT8 and FT4 speeds so stations could use either modes in either slots.
23 Nov 2020
FT8/FT4 presentation
Southgate News has a link to a USA YouTube presentation on these modes. There are lots of presentations about these digital modes on YouTube. FT8 works with low power and simple antennas, but is not a mode for chatting.
I have to admit, I have not yet tried FT4.
See http://www.southgatearc.org/news/2020/november/ft8-and-ft4-lecture-video.htm#.X7ufE2iTLrc
8 May 2020
FT4 - not tried
At some point, I must do so. It is much faster than FT8, but probably not as good on very weak signals. I don't know about Doppler, but I suspect it might be better on very brief Es openings.
31 May 2019
FT4
See http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/wsjtx.html
14 May 2019
24 Apr 2019
FT4 digital contest mode
See http://southgatearc.org/news/2019/april/new-digital-mode-ft4.htm