As my 10m antenna is available, I am on 10m QRP WSPR with 500mW.
UPDATE 1524z: 8 unique stations have spotted me.
UPDATE 1804z: 9 unique stations have spotted me today.
Simple QRP projects, 10m, 8m, 6m, 4m, FT8, 160m, WSPR, LF/MF, sub-9kHz, nanowaves and other random stuff, some not related to amateur radio.
As my 10m antenna is available, I am on 10m QRP WSPR with 500mW.
UPDATE 1524z: 8 unique stations have spotted me.
UPDATE 1804z: 9 unique stations have spotted me today.
At 1454z, my 2.5W 8m FT8 was turned on. Yet again, the antenna is just the low wire dipole. It is again on 40.680 MHz USB dial.
UPDATE 1508z: Already spotted by Phil EI9KP (649km).
UPDATE 2150z: In the end just the spot by EI9KP. Now QRT.
UPDATE 2155z: I am unsure how to proceed with experiments on 8m. I am prepared to spend £50 for an extension of my T&I permit, but object to having to pay for this. In my view, this should be a tiny amateur band available in the UK by NoV. It would be really helpful to know just why OFCOM and the FCC are quite so anti this. It is not that they are neutral. They seem to be dead against this. Personally, I think it is the military and the Official Secrets Act (or equivalent in the USA) that is preventing us being told the full truth. People are scared of prosecution. If we were just told, "yes the military is blocking all applications" that alone would clear up this apparently stupid situation. This year's tests have already shown that with Es and F2, great distances may be covered with just 2.5W and a low wire dipole. There is no doubt that a higher ERP certainly improves chances.
Last week, it was unusually cold. We had snow on the ground for a week. These days, this is almost unheard of.
Nighttime temperatures were very low indeed and some parts of the UK remained below freezing all day. Last night the thaw came and there is no snow at all left. It just went.
Temperatures today are much milder. Probably it is 10-20 degrees Celsius milder. It is wet and windy. I prefer the sun and snow, but not the temperatures that go with it!
At the moment I am RX only on 10m FT8, 178 stations (at 1205z) so far spotted.
Initially I was getting very few spots until I realised the coax plug was shorted. Now corrected, the SWR is again very low. This could account why yesterday there were so few reports of my 500mW WSPR TX.
Like the heating which failed due to the very cold weather last week (thankfully now fine) you don't realise how important things are until you can not have them.
As my 8m coax has been mended, I am again on 8m QRP FT8 with 2.5W on 40.680 MHz.
UPDATE 2110z: No spots. Now QRT.
![]() |
| Sunrise this morning |
Today I have again been on 10m WSPR TX with 500mW from my little W5OLF beacon. Surprisingly just a single spot from YO3BN (2083km). Odd, I usually see many more with the USA coming through by early afternoon,
Much of the morning I was on 2m QRP FT8, 7 stations spotted my 2.5W to the big-wheel omni antenna and I spotted 35 stations on RX (see maps).
![]() |
| Stations spotted on 2m FT8 RX this morning |
![]() |
| Stations spotting my 2.5W FT8 on 2m this morning |
This was one of the reasons I did not get around to fixing my 8m antenna/coax issue today. Maybe tomorrow?
For some time now, there has been speculation about just why the FCC and OFCOM are so much against even a small amateur allocation at 8m. It is not as if they are neutral. The clear impression is they are dead against this.
One possibility is that the military are doing their best to keep the "riffraff" out.
Even recent experimental licences in the USA have been turned down. It is almost as if the real reason for refusals is being hidden.
One possibility is that officials in OFCOM and the FCC have signed the Official Secrets Act or it equivalent and cannot reveal the full truth without fearing prosecution.
Logically, a tiny 8m band could help research. I am convinced we are not being told the whole truth. I suspect the 40.66-40.70 MHz ISM band is a real embarrassment.
I wonder if OFCOM will renew my 8m permit?
In my emails today was the Elecraft Newsletter.
One of the articles was about "extreme QRP". This looks interesting I thought, only find out it was about 1W. To my mind extreme QRP is microwatts, not watts. I would have been more impressed if this person had got spots with 100uW rather than 1W!!
From my own tests years ago, well below 1W can get spots.
I know of at least one person who has been spotted across the planet with 20mW on 30m.
Most of the day I have been on 2m QRP FT8.
UPDATE 1741z: As PSKreporter seems not to be working at the moment, I am not sure where I have been spotted today.
For some people these could be very useful. They use the cellular network as the bearer rather than the ionosphere, so the range is effecti...