As Monday morning is housework time here, I might put my WSPR 500mW W5OLF beacon on for a while.
UPDATE 1310z: 10 stations have spotted me today.
Simple QRP projects, 10m, 8m, 6m, 4m, FT8, 160m, WSPR, LF/MF, sub-9kHz, nanowaves and other random stuff, some not related to amateur radio.
As Monday morning is housework time here, I might put my WSPR 500mW W5OLF beacon on for a while.
UPDATE 1310z: 10 stations have spotted me today.
It is years since I did optical experiments. My current plan is to do some local tests with QRSS bouncing off buildings. If these are successful, I want to try an "over the horizon" test with G4HJW.
My first task will be to install Spectran 2 software as this will be needed to decode QRSS and to check the signal margins.
Some years ago there was a Russian QRP club that was quite active on 20m CW.
At the moment Russia is not in our good books over Ukraine, but I personally have no issues with the Russian people. Indeed, at the height of the "cold war" many Russians were worked and, via the medium of amateur radio, barriers were broken down. All were human beings just like us!
In my view we have to keep politics out of amateur radio. One of the great things about our hobby is we are all equal whether we come for Russia, the USA, Ghana or wherever. If will be a sad day if barriers are ever erected.
Does Club-72 still exist?
See https://sites.google.com/view/g3xbm4/home/vhfuhfmicrowaves/vhfuhf-commercial-rigs/mizuho-mx2.
One of my aims this week is to try FT8 on my FT-710. As a keen QRPer, I usually run low power and this will be no exception. In the end I overcame my issues with noise on FT8 RX with the IC-705. I hope this is not an issue on the FT-710. If it is, I shall add ferrite chokes on the USB cable between the rig and PC.
Ferrite rods are commonly used as RX antennas on MW and LW. They are compact and efficient for their intended purpose. Their use as TX antennas is almost non-existent.
As long as the ferrite is suitable for the frequency and as long as the ferrite is not in saturation, they may be used on TX. This implies very low power, but we know on WSPR and possibly FT8, long distances may be spanned with very low power indeed. Certainly great ranges have been covered with milliwatts and microwatts.
Some years ago, I did some TX tests with ferrite rods and the results surprised me.
In absolute terms, I have little idea about their loss compared with, say, a dipole. At 630m and 160m, antenna efficiencies are often -30dBd or worse, so they could be far better than we might expect. They certainly are small! Some people have bundled several rods together. I have not tried this.
This is yet another area in which radio amateurs can carry out useful research. Be careful that the ferrite rod alone is doing the work and you are not coupling into a bigger antenna nearby.
In my view ferrite rods "compress space" within the rod. As such, they could be used as magnetic or loading in E-field antennas.Remeber to keep power very low.
See https://sites.google.com/view/g3xbm4/home/antennas/ferrite-rod-tx-antennas .
Our brains have limited size and to most people time is a mystery. Certainly my experience is that time passes faster as we get older. Some ...