8 Jan 2014

Best value new QRP transenceivers

At  the moment the running order, ignoring wSDR designs, is:
  • Elecraft KX3  - best RX, expensive with all options in the UK. n ternal auto-ATU option
  • Ten-Tec Argonaut VI - excellent RX and ideal base station but no  5,24 or 50MHz coverage.Expensive.
  • Yaesu FT817ND - excellent base/portable unit up to 432MHz,but RX not as good as KX3 or Argonaut VI. 13-14 year old design.
  • Icom IC703 - excellent base transceiver,but no longer available new. Internal auto-ATU.
Overall, the FT817ND represents best value for money all things considered, in my view. It may be an old design but I can buy 2 FT817ND with plenty of change for the price of the KX3. And I get a better design for home station digital (WSPR) use with botj 144 + 432MHz bands. Even adding a Z817 or T1 auto-ATU to the price of the FT817ND units there is still change when compared with the fully loaded KX3.

Reviews on www.eham.net are similar for all radios listed.

5 comments:

  1. Your forgetting the X1M. Now available in the UK £279.96, checkout Moonrakers website stock seems limited?: http://www.moonraker.eu/popular-products/x1m-platinum-5-band-qrp-80-10m-hf-transceiver

    73 G1KQH

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's true the KX3 is not cheap price wise that is but I do have one and am very happy with it. I really like the support and constant updates that are offered by Elecraft.
    Mike

    ReplyDelete
  3. Roger - How well does the 817 RX perform on LF / 2200 m? Deaf or useable without a preamp?

    Steve / VE7SL

    PS .....super to see you back! 73

    ReplyDelete
  4. For a fairer price comparison you should add the cost of an exterhal ATU such as the Elecraft T1 to the price of the 817.

    Julian, G4ILO

    ReplyDelete
  5. And also a CW filter to the '817. I don't know about the UK, but in the US, when optioned equally, the difference is more like 20 to 25% - and for that you get much better ergonomics in addition to the better performance of the KX3. I had both the KX3 and FT817ND side by side and there was really no comparison. I'm not saying that the '817 is a bad radio - it's not. But the KX3 is *much* better, and when calculating (performance + ergonomics)/price, the result is the KX3 has more bang for the buck (or "value")...even if it takes more bucks! IMO.

    73 de Lee, AA4GA

    ReplyDelete